[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2ad70157-27d1-41df-8866-c226af690cf6@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 09:36:34 +0530
From: Pavan Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>
To: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@...cinc.com>
CC: <will@...nel.org>, <robin.murphy@....com>, <joro@...tes.org>,
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
<jsnitsel@...hat.com>, <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>, <mani@...nel.org>,
<quic_eberman@...cinc.com>, <robdclark@...omium.org>,
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, <robh@...nel.org>,
<vladimir.oltean@....com>, <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>,
<quic_molvera@...cinc.com>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <qipl.kernel.upstream@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR for custom
prefetcher settings
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 05:12:18PM +0530, Bibek Kumar Patro wrote:
> static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
> {
> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> + struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
> + const struct actlr_variant *actlrvar;
> + int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
> struct adreno_smmu_priv *priv;
>
> smmu_domain->cfg.flush_walk_prefer_tlbiasid = true;
> @@ -248,6 +285,16 @@ static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> priv->set_stall = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_stall;
> priv->resume_translation = qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation;
>
> + if (qsmmu->data->actlrvar) {
> + actlrvar = qsmmu->data->actlrvar;
> + for (; actlrvar->io_start; actlrvar++) {
> + if (actlrvar->io_start == smmu->ioaddr) {
> + qcom_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, actlrvar->actlrcfg);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -274,6 +321,21 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_smmu_client_of_match[] __maybe_unused = {
> static int qcom_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
> {
> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> + struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
> + const struct actlr_variant *actlrvar;
> + int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
> +
> + if (qsmmu->data->actlrvar) {
> + actlrvar = qsmmu->data->actlrvar;
> + for (; actlrvar->io_start; actlrvar++) {
> + if (actlrvar->io_start == smmu->ioaddr) {
> + qcom_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, actlrvar->actlrcfg);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
This block and the one in qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context() are exactly
the same. Possible to do some refactoring?
> smmu_domain->cfg.flush_walk_prefer_tlbiasid = true;
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
> index f3b91963e234..29d26dfa2ed9 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> /*
> - * Copyright (c) 2022, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> + * Copyright (c) 2023, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> */
>
It should be 2022-2023 .
> #ifndef _ARM_SMMU_QCOM_H
> @@ -24,8 +24,17 @@ struct qcom_smmu_config {
> const u32 *reg_offset;
> };
>
> +struct actlr_config;
> +
> +struct actlr_variant {
> + const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg;
> + const resource_size_t io_start;
> +};
> +
> struct qcom_smmu_match_data {
> + const struct actlr_variant *actlrvar;
> const struct qcom_smmu_config *cfg;
> + const int num_smmu;
> const struct arm_smmu_impl *impl;
> const struct arm_smmu_impl *adreno_impl;
> };
qcom_smmu_match_data::num_smmu needs cleanup.
Thanks,
Pavan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists