[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <i3oybmf3axeyk5rcef5kgfdb4cucd63h24gup6idn62nq3vvav@4mfzwzyamq27>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 09:41:54 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] intel_th: Convert to platform remove callback
returning void
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 09:28:26PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
> many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
> returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
> from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
>
> To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
> void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
> .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
> are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
>
> Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
> callback to the void returning variant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
I didn't get any feedback to this patch and it didn't make it into next
up to now.
Is this still on someone's radar?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists