[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZZ5g5iM5+xfw1pJ6@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 01:18:30 -0800
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: riel@...riel.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
vegard.nossum@...cle.com, rppt@...nel.org, songmuchun@...edance.com,
shy828301@...il.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] selftests/mm: new test that steals pages
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 09:47:31PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 07:54:19 -0800 Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org> wrote:
>
> > This test stresses the race between of madvise(DONTNEED), a page fault
> > and a parallel huge page mmap, which should fail due to lack of
> > available page available for mapping.
> >
> > This test case must run on a system with one and only one huge page
> > available.
> >
> > # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
>
> Can't the test framework perform this configuration prior to running
> the test?
We have this infrastructure already set in the run_vmtest.sh.
The "hugetlb_fault_after_madv" selftest needs the same configuration,
so, once the fix is ready, we will just add something as:
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
@@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ nr_hugepages_tmp=$(cat /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages)
# For this test, we need one and just one huge page
echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugetlb_fault_after_madv
+CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugetlb_madv_vs_map
# Restore the previous number of huge pages, since further tests rely on it
echo "$nr_hugepages_tmp" > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
Powered by blists - more mailing lists