[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4e272d5d-ec19-7621-1346-4363b0070b1c@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 12:22:34 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>
To: Udipto Goswami <quic_ugoswami@...cinc.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Krishna Kurapati <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] usb: core: Prevent null pointer dereference in
update_port_device_state
On 1/10/24 12:14 PM, Udipto Goswami wrote:
> Currently,the function update_port_device_state gets the usb_hub from
Need space between comma and "the"...
> udev->parent by calling usb_hub_to_struct_hub.
> However, in case the actconfig or the maxchild is 0, the usb_hub would
> be NULL and upon further accessing to get port_dev would result in null
> pointer dereference.
>
> Fix this by introducing an if check after the usb_hub is populated.
>
> Fixes: 83cb2604f641 ("usb: core: add sysfs entry for usb device state")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Udipto Goswami <quic_ugoswami@...cinc.com>
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> index ffd7c99e24a3..5ba1875e6bf4 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> @@ -2053,9 +2053,22 @@ static void update_port_device_state(struct usb_device *udev)
>
> if (udev->parent) {
> hub = usb_hub_to_struct_hub(udev->parent);
> - port_dev = hub->ports[udev->portnum - 1];
> - WRITE_ONCE(port_dev->state, udev->state);
> - sysfs_notify_dirent(port_dev->state_kn);
> +
> + /*
> + * The Link Layer Validation System Driver (lvstest)
> + * has step to unbind the hub before running the rest
> + * of the procedure. This triggers hub_disconnect which
> + * will set the hub's maxchild to 0, further resulting
Resulting in.
> + * usb_hub_to_struct_hub returning NULL.
> + *
> + * Add if check to avoid running into NULL pointer
> + * de-reference.
This is obvious from the code below, I think...
> + */
> + if (hub) {
> + port_dev = hub->ports[udev->portnum - 1];
> + WRITE_ONCE(port_dev->state, udev->state);
> + sysfs_notify_dirent(port_dev->state_kn);
> + }
> }
> }
>
MBR, Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists