linux-kernel - Re: [0/2] ARM: Adjustments for init_atags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <09c4cb2e-967b-4d0e-b5c6-f959e80290d9@web.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 13:52:34 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 cocci@...ia.fr
Subject: Re: [0/2] ARM: Adjustments for init_atags_procfs()

>>>>> Is this patch series still in review queues?
>>>>
>>>> See also:
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/562a6f99-3f8e-9a77-e519-b668e24dced2@web.de/
>>>> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/cocci/2023-03/msg00098.html
>>>
>>> I suspect no one looked at it, sorry.
>>
>> Special mailing list settings probably influenced this situation.

Did any communication filters hinder the clarification of further development ideas?


>>>                                       I don't catch everything that is
>>> on the mailing list. Looks fine to me but it needs to end up in the
>>> patch system to be applied.
>>
>> Can you collaborate also with mentioned mailing list archive interfaces?
>
> Err what? Sorry, I don't understand your comment.

Are you going to pick any patches up from linked information sources?

Regards,
Markus