linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: dai-common: Narrow possible sound-dai-cells

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3b1b956b-985c-45f2-bda3-018aaf897295@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 12:57:35 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: dai-common: Narrow possible
 sound-dai-cells

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 01:51:03PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 10/01/2024 12:37, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 12:07:30PM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote:

> >> If restricting things here is really important, defaulting to 0 (with a
> >> comment explaining it) and letting actual devices then override the
> >> value would feel less 'made up'

> Wait, what do you mean by "letting actual devices then override"? It's
> already like this. Nothing changed. What do you refer to?

The suggestion is that instead of limiting to 1 and having one device
override limit to 0 and have all the devices that need 1 override as
well.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)