linux-kernel - Re: [0/4] overlayfs: Adjustments for ovl_fill

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d912872a-e70a-4e5d-aabe-26f289507f44@web.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:01:24 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org,
 kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, cocci@...ia.fr,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [0/4] overlayfs: Adjustments for ovl_fill_super()

>> See also:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/87b65f8e-abde-2aff-4da8-df6e0b464677@web.de/
>> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/cocci/2023-03/msg00115.html
>
> I will queue cleanup patches 1-2,

Thanks for this positive feedback.


>                                   but I do not like patches 3/4 and 4/4.
> I do not think that they make the code better to read or maintain.

I would appreciate if the details for such change reluctance can be clarified better.

Regards,
Markus