[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240110105251.48334598@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:52:51 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Trace Kernel
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Al Viro
<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Greg
Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracefs/eventfs: Use root and instance inodes as
default ownership
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 08:07:46 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> Or are you saying that I don't need the ".permission" callback, because
> eventfs does it when it creates the inodes? But for eventfs to know what
> the permissions changes are, it uses .getattr and .setattr.
OK, if your main argument is that we do not need .permission, I agree with
you. But that's a trivial change and doesn't affect the complexity that
eventfs is doing. In fact, removing the "permission" check is simply this
patch:
--
diff --git a/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c b/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
index fdff53d5a1f8..f2af07a857e2 100644
--- a/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
+++ b/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
@@ -192,18 +192,10 @@ static int eventfs_get_attr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
return 0;
}
-static int eventfs_permission(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
- struct inode *inode, int mask)
-{
- set_top_events_ownership(inode);
- return generic_permission(idmap, inode, mask);
-}
-
static const struct inode_operations eventfs_root_dir_inode_operations = {
.lookup = eventfs_root_lookup,
.setattr = eventfs_set_attr,
.getattr = eventfs_get_attr,
- .permission = eventfs_permission,
};
static const struct inode_operations eventfs_file_inode_operations = {
--
I only did that because Linus mentioned it, and I thought it was needed.
I'll apply this patch too, as it appears to work with this code.
Thanks!
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists