| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAGfWUPxuqJCQgdAj-3TUrXWtY05oji7mN+0aBkhYDbF-qGg1sA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 12:32:30 -0800
From: Aahil Awatramani <aahila@...gle.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
Cc: David Dillow <dave@...dillows.org>, Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 net-next v2] bonding: Extending LACP MUX State Machine
to include a Collecting State.
> I think this last sentence is (a) unclear, and (b) should be
> first in the paragraph; I'd suggest something like:
>
> Add support for the independent control state machine per IEEE
> 802.1AX-2008 5.4.15 in addition to the existing implementation of the
> coupled control state machine.
>
> The Subject should change in a similar way, e.g., "Add
> independent control state machine."
Done, I have made the suggested changes.
> How did you test this to insure that the new logic works
> correctly against both coupled and independent control implementations?
I toggled between coupled and independent control modes. In each I
manually went through multiple test scenarios (host reboots, switch
link-flaps and link up/down from host side) by controlling
peer/switch. I used tcpdump to ensure the correct transitioning of the
LACP states for the given modes.
> This name seems suboptimal, perhaps __port_should_goto_attached_state?
>
> I'll also note that every use of this function then immediately
> executes "port->sm_mux_state = AD_MUX_ATTACHED", this could plausibly be
> combined into a __port_move_to_attached_state function that returns true
> or false, e.g.,
>
> if (__port_should_mux_attached(port)) {
> port->sm_mux_state = AD_MUX_ATTACHED;
> } else {
> /* if port state hasn't changed make
> * sure that a collecting distributing
> * port in an active aggregator is enabled
> */
> if (port->aggregator &&
> port->aggregator->is_active &&
>
> would become something like:
>
> if (!__port_move_to_attached_state(port)) {
> /* if port state hasn't changed make
> * sure that a collecting distributing
> * port in an active aggregator is enabled
> */
> if (port->aggregator &&
> port->aggregator->is_active &&
>
>
Done, I have made the suggested changes.
> Is it possible for port->aggregator to be NULL here? I don't
> think it's possible for a port to get to this state and not be attached
> to an aggregator (it has to be SELECTED by this point).
I think you are right, I do not think it is possible for a port to be
in this state and not be attached to an aggregator. Initially I was
preserving the previous logic but now I have removed the NULL check in
both places.
> The "!= 0" is superfluous here as bond_is_slave_rx_disabled()
> returns a boolean.
Done.
> I believe this should permit changes to coupled_control only if
> the bond is down, or up with no interfaces attached to it. The two
> state machines are not interchangable.
I added the BOND_OPTFLAG_IFDOWN flag to the coupled_control
bond_option. I think we should keep it such that we can only permit
changes when the bond is down similar to mode selection.
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 5:35 PM Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onicalcom> wrote:
>
> Aahil Awatramani <aahila@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> >Introduces two new states, AD_MUX_COLLECTING and AD_MUX_DISTRIBUTING in
> >the LACP MUX state machine for separated handling of an initial
> >Collecting state before the Collecting and Distributing state. This
> >enables a port to be in a state where it can receive incoming packets
> >while not still distributing. This is useful for reducing packet loss when
> >a port begins distributing before its partner is able to collect.
> >Additionally this also brings the 802.3ad bonding driver's implementation
> >closer to the LACP specification which already predefined this behaviour,
> >that is currently the implementation only supports coupled control.
>
> I think this last sentence is (a) unclear, and (b) should be
> first in the paragraph; I'd suggest something like:
>
> Add support for the independent control state machine per IEEE
> 802.1AX-2008 5.4.15 in addition to the existing implementation of the
> coupled control state machine.
>
> The Subject should change in a similar way, e.g., "Add
> independent control state machine."
>
> >Added new functions such as bond_set_slave_tx_disabled_flags and
> >bond_set_slave_rx_enabled_flags to precisely manage the port's collecting
> >and distributing states. Previously, there was no dedicated method to
> >disable TX while keeping RX enabled, which this patch addresses.
> >
> >Note that the regular flow process in the kernel's bonding driver remains
> >unaffected by this patch. The extension requires explicit opt-in by the
> >user (in order to ensure no disruptions for existing setups) via netlink
> >support using the new bonding parameter coupled_control. The default value
> >for coupled_control is set to 1 so as to preserve existing behaviour.
>
> How did you test this to insure that the new logic works
> correctly against both coupled and independent control implementations?
>
> >Signed-off-by: Aahil Awatramani <aahila@...gle.com>
> >---
> > drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c | 159 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 1 +
> > drivers/net/bonding/bond_netlink.c | 16 +++
> > drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c | 26 ++++-
> > include/net/bond_3ad.h | 2 +
> > include/net/bond_options.h | 1 +
> > include/net/bonding.h | 23 +++++
> > include/uapi/linux/if_link.h | 1 +
> > tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h | 1 +
> > 9 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
> >index c99ffe6c683a..c2a658f2aaa3 100644
> >--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
> >+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
> >@@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ static void ad_agg_selection_logic(struct aggregator *aggregator,
> > static void ad_clear_agg(struct aggregator *aggregator);
> > static void ad_initialize_agg(struct aggregator *aggregator);
> > static void ad_initialize_port(struct port *port, int lacp_fast);
> >+static void ad_enable_collecting(struct port *port);
> >+static void ad_disable_distributing(struct port *port,
> >+ bool *update_slave_arr);
> > static void ad_enable_collecting_distributing(struct port *port,
> > bool *update_slave_arr);
> > static void ad_disable_collecting_distributing(struct port *port,
> >@@ -171,9 +174,38 @@ static inline int __agg_has_partner(struct aggregator *agg)
> > return !is_zero_ether_addr(agg->partner_system.mac_addr_value);
> > }
> >
> >+/**
> >+ * __disable_distributing_port - disable the port's slave for distributing.
> >+ * Port will still be able to collect.
> >+ * @port: the port we're looking at
> >+ *
> >+ * This will disable only distributing on the port's slave.
> >+ */
> >+static inline void __disable_distributing_port(struct port *port)
> >+{
> >+ bond_set_slave_tx_disabled_flags(port->slave, BOND_SLAVE_NOTIFY_LATER);
> >+}
> >+
> >+/**
> >+ * __enable_collecting_port - enable the port's slave for collecting,
> >+ * if it's up
> >+ * @port: the port we're looking at
> >+ *
> >+ * This will enable only collecting on the port's slave.
> >+ */
> >+static inline void __enable_collecting_port(struct port *port)
> >+{
> >+ struct slave *slave = port->slave;
> >+
> >+ if (slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP && bond_slave_is_up(slave))
> >+ bond_set_slave_rx_enabled_flags(slave, BOND_SLAVE_NOTIFY_LATER);
> >+}
> >+
> > /**
> > * __disable_port - disable the port's slave
> > * @port: the port we're looking at
> >+ *
> >+ * This will disable both collecting and distributing on the port's slave.
> > */
> > static inline void __disable_port(struct port *port)
> > {
> >@@ -183,6 +215,8 @@ static inline void __disable_port(struct port *port)
> > /**
> > * __enable_port - enable the port's slave, if it's up
> > * @port: the port we're looking at
> >+ *
> >+ * This will enable both collecting and distributing on the port's slave.
> > */
> > static inline void __enable_port(struct port *port)
> > {
> >@@ -193,10 +227,24 @@ static inline void __enable_port(struct port *port)
> > }
> >
> > /**
> >- * __port_is_enabled - check if the port's slave is in active state
> >+ * __port_should_mux_attached - check if port should transition back to attached
> >+ * state.
> > * @port: the port we're looking at
> > */
> >-static inline int __port_is_enabled(struct port *port)
> >+static inline int __port_should_mux_attached(struct port *port)
>
> This name seems suboptimal, perhaps __port_should_goto_attached_state?
>
> I'll also note that every use of this function then immediately
> executes "port->sm_mux_state = AD_MUX_ATTACHED", this could plausibly be
> combined into a __port_move_to_attached_state function that returns true
> or false, e.g.,
>
> if (__port_should_mux_attached(port)) {
> port->sm_mux_state = AD_MUX_ATTACHED;
> } else {
> /* if port state hasn't changed make
> * sure that a collecting distributing
> * port in an active aggregator is enabled
> */
> if (port->aggregator &&
> port->aggregator->is_active &&
>
> would become something like:
>
> if (!__port_move_to_attached_state(port)) {
> /* if port state hasn't changed make
> * sure that a collecting distributing
> * port in an active aggregator is enabled
> */
> if (port->aggregator &&
> port->aggregator->is_active &&
>
>
> >+{
> >+ return !(port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_SELECTED) ||
> >+ (port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_STANDBY) ||
> >+ !(port->partner_oper.port_state & LACP_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION) ||
> >+ !(port->actor_oper_port_state & LACP_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION);
> >+}
> >+
> >+/**
> >+ * __port_is_collecting_distributing - check if the port's slave is in the
> >+ * combined collecting/distributing state
> >+ * @port: the port we're looking at
> >+ */
> >+static inline int __port_is_collecting_distributing(struct port *port)
> > {
> > return bond_is_active_slave(port->slave);
> > }
> >@@ -942,6 +990,7 @@ static int ad_marker_send(struct port *port, struct bond_marker *marker)
> > */
> > static void ad_mux_machine(struct port *port, bool *update_slave_arr)
> > {
> >+ struct bonding *bond = __get_bond_by_port(port);
> > mux_states_t last_state;
> >
> > /* keep current State Machine state to compare later if it was
> >@@ -999,9 +1048,13 @@ static void ad_mux_machine(struct port *port, bool *update_slave_arr)
> > if ((port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_SELECTED) &&
> > (port->partner_oper.port_state & LACP_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION) &&
> > !__check_agg_selection_timer(port)) {
> >- if (port->aggregator->is_active)
> >- port->sm_mux_state =
> >- AD_MUX_COLLECTING_DISTRIBUTING;
> >+ if (port->aggregator->is_active) {
> >+ int state = AD_MUX_COLLECTING_DISTRIBUTING;
> >+
> >+ if (!bond->params.coupled_control)
> >+ state = AD_MUX_COLLECTING;
> >+ port->sm_mux_state = state;
> >+ }
> > } else if (!(port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_SELECTED) ||
> > (port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_STANDBY)) {
> > /* if UNSELECTED or STANDBY */
> >@@ -1019,11 +1072,50 @@ static void ad_mux_machine(struct port *port, bool *update_slave_arr)
> > }
> > break;
> > case AD_MUX_COLLECTING_DISTRIBUTING:
> >+ if (__port_should_mux_attached(port)) {
> >+ port->sm_mux_state = AD_MUX_ATTACHED;
> >+ } else {
> >+ /* if port state hasn't changed make
> >+ * sure that a collecting distributing
> >+ * port in an active aggregator is enabled
> >+ */
> >+ if (port->aggregator &&
> >+ port->aggregator->is_active &&
>
> Is it possible for port->aggregator to be NULL here? I don't
> think it's possible for a port to get to this state and not be attached
> to an aggregator (it has to be SELECTED by this point).
>
> This test logic could also be moved into a helper function if
> the NULL check is necessary.
>
> >+ !__port_is_collecting_distributing(port)) {
> >+ __enable_port(port);
> >+ *update_slave_arr = true;
> >+ }
> >+ }
> >+ break;
> >+ case AD_MUX_COLLECTING:
> >+ if (__port_should_mux_attached(port)) {
> >+ port->sm_mux_state = AD_MUX_ATTACHED;
> >+ } else if ((port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_SELECTED) &&
> >+ (port->partner_oper.port_state & LACP_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION) &&
> >+ (port->partner_oper.port_state & LACP_STATE_COLLECTING)) {
> >+ port->sm_mux_state = AD_MUX_DISTRIBUTING;
> >+ } else {
> >+ /* If port state hasn't changed, make sure that a collecting
> >+ * port is enabled for an active aggregator.
> >+ */
> >+ if (port->aggregator &&
> >+ port->aggregator->is_active) {
>
> Same comment as previous.
>
> >+ struct slave *slave = port->slave;
> >+
> >+ if (bond_is_slave_rx_disabled(slave) != 0) {
>
> The "!= 0" is superfluous here as bond_is_slave_rx_disabled()
> returns a boolean.
>
> >+ ad_enable_collecting(port);
> >+ *update_slave_arr = true;
> >+ }
> >+ }
> >+ }
> >+ break;
> >+ case AD_MUX_DISTRIBUTING:
> > if (!(port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_SELECTED) ||
> > (port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_STANDBY) ||
> >+ !(port->partner_oper.port_state & LACP_STATE_COLLECTING) ||
> > !(port->partner_oper.port_state & LACP_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION) ||
> > !(port->actor_oper_port_state & LACP_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION)) {
> >- port->sm_mux_state = AD_MUX_ATTACHED;
> >+ port->sm_mux_state = AD_MUX_COLLECTING;
> > } else {
> > /* if port state hasn't changed make
> > * sure that a collecting distributing
> >@@ -1031,7 +1123,7 @@ static void ad_mux_machine(struct port *port, bool *update_slave_arr)
> > */
> > if (port->aggregator &&
> > port->aggregator->is_active &&
> >- !__port_is_enabled(port)) {
> >+ !__port_is_collecting_distributing(port)) {
> > __enable_port(port);
> > *update_slave_arr = true;
> > }
> >@@ -1082,6 +1174,20 @@ static void ad_mux_machine(struct port *port, bool *update_slave_arr)
> > update_slave_arr);
> > port->ntt = true;
> > break;
> >+ case AD_MUX_COLLECTING:
> >+ port->actor_oper_port_state |= LACP_STATE_COLLECTING;
> >+ port->actor_oper_port_state &= ~LACP_STATE_DISTRIBUTING;
> >+ port->actor_oper_port_state |= LACP_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION;
> >+ ad_enable_collecting(port);
> >+ ad_disable_distributing(port, update_slave_arr);
> >+ port->ntt = true;
> >+ break;
> >+ case AD_MUX_DISTRIBUTING:
> >+ port->actor_oper_port_state |= LACP_STATE_DISTRIBUTING;
> >+ port->actor_oper_port_state |= LACP_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION;
> >+ ad_enable_collecting_distributing(port,
> >+ update_slave_arr);
> >+ break;
> > default:
> > break;
> > }
> >@@ -1906,6 +2012,45 @@ static void ad_initialize_port(struct port *port, int lacp_fast)
> > }
> > }
> >
> >+/**
> >+ * ad_enable_collecting - enable a port's receive
> >+ * @port: the port we're looking at
> >+ *
> >+ * Enable @port if it's in an active aggregator
> >+ */
> >+static void ad_enable_collecting(struct port *port)
> >+{
> >+ if (port->aggregator->is_active) {
> >+ struct slave *slave = port->slave;
> >+
> >+ slave_dbg(slave->bond->dev, slave->dev,
> >+ "Enabling collecting on port %d (LAG %d)\n",
> >+ port->actor_port_number,
> >+ port->aggregator->aggregator_identifier);
> >+ __enable_collecting_port(port);
> >+ }
> >+}
> >+
> >+/**
> >+ * ad_disable_distributing - disable a port's transmit
> >+ * @port: the port we're looking at
> >+ * @update_slave_arr: Does slave array need update?
> >+ */
> >+static void ad_disable_distributing(struct port *port, bool *update_slave_arr)
> >+{
> >+ if (port->aggregator &&
> >+ !MAC_ADDRESS_EQUAL(&port->aggregator->partner_system,
> >+ &(null_mac_addr))) {
> >+ slave_dbg(port->slave->bond->dev, port->slave->dev,
> >+ "Disabling distributing on port %d (LAG %d)\n",
> >+ port->actor_port_number,
> >+ port->aggregator->aggregator_identifier);
> >+ __disable_distributing_port(port);
> >+ /* Slave array needs an update */
> >+ *update_slave_arr = true;
> >+ }
> >+}
> >+
> > /**
> > * ad_enable_collecting_distributing - enable a port's transmit/receive
> > * @port: the port we're looking at
> >diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> >index 8e6cc0e133b7..30f4b0ff01c0 100644
> >--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> >+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> >@@ -6331,6 +6331,7 @@ static int __init bond_check_params(struct bond_params *params)
> > params->ad_actor_sys_prio = ad_actor_sys_prio;
> > eth_zero_addr(params->ad_actor_system);
> > params->ad_user_port_key = ad_user_port_key;
> >+ params->coupled_control = 1;
> > if (packets_per_slave > 0) {
> > params->reciprocal_packets_per_slave =
> > reciprocal_value(packets_per_slave);
> >diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_netlink.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_netlink.c
> >index cfa74cf8bb1a..29b4c3d1b9b6 100644
> >--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_netlink.c
> >+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_netlink.c
> >@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy bond_policy[IFLA_BOND_MAX + 1] = {
> > [IFLA_BOND_PEER_NOTIF_DELAY] = NLA_POLICY_FULL_RANGE(NLA_U32, &delay_range),
> > [IFLA_BOND_MISSED_MAX] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
> > [IFLA_BOND_NS_IP6_TARGET] = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
> >+ [IFLA_BOND_COUPLED_CONTROL] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
> > };
> >
> > static const struct nla_policy bond_slave_policy[IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_MAX + 1] = {
> >@@ -549,6 +550,16 @@ static int bond_changelink(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct nlattr *tb[],
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> >+ if (data[IFLA_BOND_COUPLED_CONTROL]) {
> >+ int coupled_control = nla_get_u8(data[IFLA_BOND_COUPLED_CONTROL]);
> >+
> >+ bond_opt_initval(&newval, coupled_control);
> >+ err = __bond_opt_set(bond, BOND_OPT_COUPLED_CONTROL, &newval,
> >+ data[IFLA_BOND_COUPLED_CONTROL], extack);
> >+ if (err)
> >+ return err;
> >+ }
> >+
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> >@@ -615,6 +626,7 @@ static size_t bond_get_size(const struct net_device *bond_dev)
> > /* IFLA_BOND_NS_IP6_TARGET */
> > nla_total_size(sizeof(struct nlattr)) +
> > nla_total_size(sizeof(struct in6_addr)) * BOND_MAX_NS_TARGETS +
> >+ nla_total_size(sizeof(u8)) + /* IFLA_BOND_COUPLED_CONTROL */
> > 0;
> > }
> >
> >@@ -774,6 +786,10 @@ static int bond_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > bond->params.missed_max))
> > goto nla_put_failure;
> >
> >+ if (nla_put_u8(skb, IFLA_BOND_COUPLED_CONTROL,
> >+ bond->params.coupled_control))
> >+ goto nla_put_failure;
> >+
> > if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD) {
> > struct ad_info info;
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
> >index f3f27f0bd2a6..af5d3c57700b 100644
> >--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
> >+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
> >@@ -84,7 +84,8 @@ static int bond_option_ad_user_port_key_set(struct bonding *bond,
> > const struct bond_opt_value *newval);
> > static int bond_option_missed_max_set(struct bonding *bond,
> > const struct bond_opt_value *newval);
> >-
> >+static int bond_option_coupled_control_set(struct bonding *bond,
> >+ const struct bond_opt_value *newval);
> >
> > static const struct bond_opt_value bond_mode_tbl[] = {
> > { "balance-rr", BOND_MODE_ROUNDROBIN, BOND_VALFLAG_DEFAULT},
> >@@ -232,6 +233,12 @@ static const struct bond_opt_value bond_missed_max_tbl[] = {
> > { NULL, -1, 0},
> > };
> >
> >+static const struct bond_opt_value bond_coupled_control_tbl[] = {
> >+ { "on", 1, BOND_VALFLAG_DEFAULT},
> >+ { "off", 0, 0},
> >+ { NULL, -1, 0},
> >+};
> >+
> > static const struct bond_option bond_opts[BOND_OPT_LAST] = {
> > [BOND_OPT_MODE] = {
> > .id = BOND_OPT_MODE,
> >@@ -496,6 +503,14 @@ static const struct bond_option bond_opts[BOND_OPT_LAST] = {
> > .desc = "Delay between each peer notification on failover event, in milliseconds",
> > .values = bond_peer_notif_delay_tbl,
> > .set = bond_option_peer_notif_delay_set
> >+ },
> >+ [BOND_OPT_COUPLED_CONTROL] = {
> >+ .id = BOND_OPT_COUPLED_CONTROL,
> >+ .name = "coupled_control",
> >+ .desc = "Opt into using coupled control MUX for LACP states",
> >+ .unsuppmodes = BOND_MODE_ALL_EX(BIT(BOND_MODE_8023AD)),
> >+ .values = bond_coupled_control_tbl,
> >+ .set = bond_option_coupled_control_set,
> > }
> > };
> >
> >@@ -1692,3 +1707,12 @@ static int bond_option_ad_user_port_key_set(struct bonding *bond,
> > bond->params.ad_user_port_key = newval->value;
> > return 0;
> > }
> >+
> >+static int bond_option_coupled_control_set(struct bonding *bond,
> >+ const struct bond_opt_value *newval)
> >+{
> >+ netdev_info(bond->dev, "Setting coupled_control to %s (%llu)\n",
> >+ newval->string, newval->value);
> >+ bond->params.coupled_control = newval->value;
> >+ return 0;
> >+}
>
> I believe this should permit changes to coupled_control only if
> the bond is down, or up with no interfaces attached to it. The two
> state machines are not interchangable.
>
> -J
>
> >diff --git a/include/net/bond_3ad.h b/include/net/bond_3ad.h
> >index c5e57c6bd873..9ce5ac2bfbad 100644
> >--- a/include/net/bond_3ad.h
> >+++ b/include/net/bond_3ad.h
> >@@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ typedef enum {
> > AD_MUX_DETACHED, /* mux machine */
> > AD_MUX_WAITING, /* mux machine */
> > AD_MUX_ATTACHED, /* mux machine */
> >+ AD_MUX_COLLECTING, /* mux machine */
> >+ AD_MUX_DISTRIBUTING, /* mux machine */
> > AD_MUX_COLLECTING_DISTRIBUTING /* mux machine */
> > } mux_states_t;
> >
> >diff --git a/include/net/bond_options.h b/include/net/bond_options.h
> >index 69292ecc0325..473a0147769e 100644
> >--- a/include/net/bond_options.h
> >+++ b/include/net/bond_options.h
> >@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ enum {
> > BOND_OPT_MISSED_MAX,
> > BOND_OPT_NS_TARGETS,
> > BOND_OPT_PRIO,
> >+ BOND_OPT_COUPLED_CONTROL,
> > BOND_OPT_LAST
> > };
> >
> >diff --git a/include/net/bonding.h b/include/net/bonding.h
> >index 5b8b1b644a2d..b61fb1aa3a56 100644
> >--- a/include/net/bonding.h
> >+++ b/include/net/bonding.h
> >@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ struct bond_params {
> > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> > struct in6_addr ns_targets[BOND_MAX_NS_TARGETS];
> > #endif
> >+ int coupled_control;
> >
> > /* 2 bytes of padding : see ether_addr_equal_64bits() */
> > u8 ad_actor_system[ETH_ALEN + 2];
> >@@ -167,6 +168,7 @@ struct slave {
> > u8 backup:1, /* indicates backup slave. Value corresponds with
> > BOND_STATE_ACTIVE and BOND_STATE_BACKUP */
> > inactive:1, /* indicates inactive slave */
> >+ rx_disabled:1, /* indicates whether slave's Rx is disabled */
> > should_notify:1, /* indicates whether the state changed */
> > should_notify_link:1; /* indicates whether the link changed */
> > u8 duplex;
> >@@ -568,6 +570,14 @@ static inline void bond_set_slave_inactive_flags(struct slave *slave,
> > bond_set_slave_state(slave, BOND_STATE_BACKUP, notify);
> > if (!slave->bond->params.all_slaves_active)
> > slave->inactive = 1;
> >+ if (BOND_MODE(slave->bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD)
> >+ slave->rx_disabled = 1;
> >+}
> >+
> >+static inline void bond_set_slave_tx_disabled_flags(struct slave *slave,
> >+ bool notify)
> >+{
> >+ bond_set_slave_state(slave, BOND_STATE_BACKUP, notify);
> > }
> >
> > static inline void bond_set_slave_active_flags(struct slave *slave,
> >@@ -575,6 +585,14 @@ static inline void bond_set_slave_active_flags(struct slave *slave,
> > {
> > bond_set_slave_state(slave, BOND_STATE_ACTIVE, notify);
> > slave->inactive = 0;
> >+ if (BOND_MODE(slave->bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD)
> >+ slave->rx_disabled = 0;
> >+}
> >+
> >+static inline void bond_set_slave_rx_enabled_flags(struct slave *slave,
> >+ bool notify)
> >+{
> >+ slave->rx_disabled = 0;
> > }
> >
> > static inline bool bond_is_slave_inactive(struct slave *slave)
> >@@ -582,6 +600,11 @@ static inline bool bond_is_slave_inactive(struct slave *slave)
> > return slave->inactive;
> > }
> >
> >+static inline bool bond_is_slave_rx_disabled(struct slave *slave)
> >+{
> >+ return slave->rx_disabled;
> >+}
> >+
> > static inline void bond_propose_link_state(struct slave *slave, int state)
> > {
> > slave->link_new_state = state;
> >diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> >index 29ff80da2775..7a54fcff2eec 100644
> >--- a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> >+++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> >@@ -976,6 +976,7 @@ enum {
> > IFLA_BOND_AD_LACP_ACTIVE,
> > IFLA_BOND_MISSED_MAX,
> > IFLA_BOND_NS_IP6_TARGET,
> >+ IFLA_BOND_COUPLED_CONTROL,
> > __IFLA_BOND_MAX,
> > };
> >
> >diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> >index a0aa05a28cf2..f0d71b2a3f1e 100644
> >--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> >+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> >@@ -974,6 +974,7 @@ enum {
> > IFLA_BOND_AD_LACP_ACTIVE,
> > IFLA_BOND_MISSED_MAX,
> > IFLA_BOND_NS_IP6_TARGET,
> >+ IFLA_BOND_COUPLED_CONTROL,
> > __IFLA_BOND_MAX,
> > };
> >
> >--
> >2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
> >
> >
>
> ---
> -Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@...onical.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists