| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZaBUFETV53cRF7RB@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 21:48:20 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "sched/cpufreq: Rework schedutil governor performance
estimation" and dependent commit
* Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 at 12:09, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 14:41, Linus Torvalds
> > > <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It's one of these two:
> > > >
> > > > f12560779f9d sched/cpufreq: Rework iowait boost
> > > > 9c0b4bb7f630 sched/cpufreq: Rework schedutil governor performance estimation
> > > >
> > > > one more boot to go, then I'll try to revert whichever causes my
> > > > machine to perform horribly much worse.
> > >
> > > I guess it should come as no surprise that the result is
> > >
> > > 9c0b4bb7f6303c9c4e2e34984c46f5a86478f84d is the first bad commit
> > >
> > > but to revert cleanly I will have to revert all of
> > >
> > > b3edde44e5d4 ("cpufreq/schedutil: Use a fixed reference frequency")
> > > f12560779f9d ("sched/cpufreq: Rework iowait boost")
> > > 9c0b4bb7f630 ("sched/cpufreq: Rework schedutil governor
> > > performance estimation")
> > >
> > > This is on a 32-core (64-thread) AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, fwiw.
> > >
> > > I'll keep that revert in my private test-tree for now (so that I have
> > > a working machine again), but I'll move it to my main branch soon
> > > unless somebody has a quick fix for this problem.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for bisecting this, and ack on the revert in any case, these
> > are relatively fresh changes that clearly didn't get enough testing - sorry!
>
> b3edde44e5d4 ("cpufreq/schedutil: Use a fixed reference frequency") is
> linked with other patches.
Indeed.
> I can provide a clean revert of only :
> f12560779f9d ("sched/cpufreq: Rework iowait boost")
> 9c0b4bb7f630 ("sched/cpufreq: Rework schedutil governor performance estimation")
I've done this too, see this new commit in sched/urgent:
60ee1706bd11 ("Revert "sched/cpufreq: Rework schedutil governor performance estimation" and dependent commit")
Also attached below.
> if the fix that i proposed doesn't work:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZZ+ixagkxRPYyTCE@vingu-book/
Yeah - although of course Linus is free to just pull the revert as well.
I'll try to reproduce the regression locally as well.
Thanks,
Ingo
===============================>
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 11:45:17 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "sched/cpufreq: Rework schedutil governor performance estimation" and dependent commit
This reverts the following commits:
f12560779f9d73 ("sched/cpufreq: Rework iowait boost")
9c0b4bb7f6303c ("sched/cpufreq: Rework schedutil governor performance estimation")
Because Linus reported a bad performance regression with the
sched_util governor, that increased the time his empty
kernel build took from 22 to 44 seconds (and can be similarly
measured in full builds as well) - and bisected it back to 9c0b4bb7f6303c.
Until we have a proper fix, revert the broken commit and its
dependent commit.
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Bisected-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wgWcYX2oXKtgvNN2LLDXP7kXkbo-xTfumEjmPbjSer2RQ@mail.gmail.com
---
include/linux/energy_model.h | 1 +
kernel/sched/core.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 64 +++++++++++-----------------
kernel/sched/fair.c | 22 ++--------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
5 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h
index 88d91e087471..c19e7effe764 100644
--- a/include/linux/energy_model.h
+++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h
@@ -243,6 +243,7 @@ static inline unsigned long em_cpu_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
scale_cpu = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
ref_freq = arch_scale_freq_ref(cpu);
+ max_util = map_util_perf(max_util);
max_util = min(max_util, allowed_cpu_cap);
freq = map_util_freq(max_util, ref_freq, scale_cpu);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 9116bcc90346..038eeaf76d2d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7468,13 +7468,18 @@ int sched_core_idle_cpu(int cpu)
* required to meet deadlines.
*/
unsigned long effective_cpu_util(int cpu, unsigned long util_cfs,
- unsigned long *min,
- unsigned long *max)
+ enum cpu_util_type type,
+ struct task_struct *p)
{
- unsigned long util, irq, scale;
+ unsigned long dl_util, util, irq, max;
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
- scale = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
+ max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
+
+ if (!uclamp_is_used() &&
+ type == FREQUENCY_UTIL && rt_rq_is_runnable(&rq->rt)) {
+ return max;
+ }
/*
* Early check to see if IRQ/steal time saturates the CPU, can be
@@ -7482,49 +7487,45 @@ unsigned long effective_cpu_util(int cpu, unsigned long util_cfs,
* update_irq_load_avg().
*/
irq = cpu_util_irq(rq);
- if (unlikely(irq >= scale)) {
- if (min)
- *min = scale;
- if (max)
- *max = scale;
- return scale;
- }
-
- if (min) {
- /*
- * The minimum utilization returns the highest level between:
- * - the computed DL bandwidth needed with the IRQ pressure which
- * steals time to the deadline task.
- * - The minimum performance requirement for CFS and/or RT.
- */
- *min = max(irq + cpu_bw_dl(rq), uclamp_rq_get(rq, UCLAMP_MIN));
-
- /*
- * When an RT task is runnable and uclamp is not used, we must
- * ensure that the task will run at maximum compute capacity.
- */
- if (!uclamp_is_used() && rt_rq_is_runnable(&rq->rt))
- *min = max(*min, scale);
- }
+ if (unlikely(irq >= max))
+ return max;
/*
* Because the time spend on RT/DL tasks is visible as 'lost' time to
* CFS tasks and we use the same metric to track the effective
* utilization (PELT windows are synchronized) we can directly add them
* to obtain the CPU's actual utilization.
+ *
+ * CFS and RT utilization can be boosted or capped, depending on
+ * utilization clamp constraints requested by currently RUNNABLE
+ * tasks.
+ * When there are no CFS RUNNABLE tasks, clamps are released and
+ * frequency will be gracefully reduced with the utilization decay.
*/
util = util_cfs + cpu_util_rt(rq);
- util += cpu_util_dl(rq);
+ if (type == FREQUENCY_UTIL)
+ util = uclamp_rq_util_with(rq, util, p);
+
+ dl_util = cpu_util_dl(rq);
/*
- * The maximum hint is a soft bandwidth requirement, which can be lower
- * than the actual utilization because of uclamp_max requirements.
+ * For frequency selection we do not make cpu_util_dl() a permanent part
+ * of this sum because we want to use cpu_bw_dl() later on, but we need
+ * to check if the CFS+RT+DL sum is saturated (ie. no idle time) such
+ * that we select f_max when there is no idle time.
+ *
+ * NOTE: numerical errors or stop class might cause us to not quite hit
+ * saturation when we should -- something for later.
*/
- if (max)
- *max = min(scale, uclamp_rq_get(rq, UCLAMP_MAX));
+ if (util + dl_util >= max)
+ return max;
- if (util >= scale)
- return scale;
+ /*
+ * OTOH, for energy computation we need the estimated running time, so
+ * include util_dl and ignore dl_bw.
+ */
+ if (type == ENERGY_UTIL)
+ util += dl_util;
/*
* There is still idle time; further improve the number by using the
@@ -7535,15 +7536,28 @@ unsigned long effective_cpu_util(int cpu, unsigned long util_cfs,
* U' = irq + --------- * U
* max
*/
- util = scale_irq_capacity(util, irq, scale);
+ util = scale_irq_capacity(util, irq, max);
util += irq;
- return min(scale, util);
+ /*
+ * Bandwidth required by DEADLINE must always be granted while, for
+ * FAIR and RT, we use blocked utilization of IDLE CPUs as a mechanism
+ * to gracefully reduce the frequency when no tasks show up for longer
+ * periods of time.
+ *
+ * Ideally we would like to set bw_dl as min/guaranteed freq and util +
+ * bw_dl as requested freq. However, cpufreq is not yet ready for such
+ * an interface. So, we only do the latter for now.
+ */
+ if (type == FREQUENCY_UTIL)
+ util += cpu_bw_dl(rq);
+
+ return min(max, util);
}
unsigned long sched_cpu_util(int cpu)
{
- return effective_cpu_util(cpu, cpu_util_cfs(cpu), NULL, NULL);
+ return effective_cpu_util(cpu, cpu_util_cfs(cpu), ENERGY_UTIL, NULL);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 95c3c097083e..5f8729c41d0a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ struct sugov_cpu {
u64 last_update;
unsigned long util;
- unsigned long bw_min;
+ unsigned long bw_dl;
/* The field below is for single-CPU policies only: */
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
@@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy,
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy;
unsigned int freq;
+ util = map_util_perf(util);
freq = get_capacity_ref_freq(policy);
freq = map_util_freq(util, freq, max);
@@ -174,31 +175,14 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy,
return cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(policy, freq);
}
-unsigned long sugov_effective_cpu_perf(int cpu, unsigned long actual,
- unsigned long min,
- unsigned long max)
+static void sugov_get_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
{
- /* Add dvfs headroom to actual utilization */
- actual = map_util_perf(actual);
- /* Actually we don't need to target the max performance */
- if (actual < max)
- max = actual;
+ unsigned long util = cpu_util_cfs_boost(sg_cpu->cpu);
+ struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu);
- /*
- * Ensure at least minimum performance while providing more compute
- * capacity when possible.
- */
- return max(min, max);
-}
-
-static void sugov_get_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, unsigned long boost)
-{
- unsigned long min, max, util = cpu_util_cfs_boost(sg_cpu->cpu);
-
- util = effective_cpu_util(sg_cpu->cpu, util, &min, &max);
- util = max(util, boost);
- sg_cpu->bw_min = min;
- sg_cpu->util = sugov_effective_cpu_perf(sg_cpu->cpu, util, min, max);
+ sg_cpu->bw_dl = cpu_bw_dl(rq);
+ sg_cpu->util = effective_cpu_util(sg_cpu->cpu, util,
+ FREQUENCY_UTIL, NULL);
}
/**
@@ -289,16 +273,18 @@ static void sugov_iowait_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time,
* This mechanism is designed to boost high frequently IO waiting tasks, while
* being more conservative on tasks which does sporadic IO operations.
*/
-static unsigned long sugov_iowait_apply(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time,
+static void sugov_iowait_apply(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time,
unsigned long max_cap)
{
+ unsigned long boost;
+
/* No boost currently required */
if (!sg_cpu->iowait_boost)
- return 0;
+ return;
/* Reset boost if the CPU appears to have been idle enough */
if (sugov_iowait_reset(sg_cpu, time, false))
- return 0;
+ return;
if (!sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending) {
/*
@@ -307,7 +293,7 @@ static unsigned long sugov_iowait_apply(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time,
sg_cpu->iowait_boost >>= 1;
if (sg_cpu->iowait_boost < IOWAIT_BOOST_MIN) {
sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0;
- return 0;
+ return;
}
}
@@ -317,7 +303,10 @@ static unsigned long sugov_iowait_apply(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time,
* sg_cpu->util is already in capacity scale; convert iowait_boost
* into the same scale so we can compare.
*/
- return (sg_cpu->iowait_boost * max_cap) >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
+ boost = (sg_cpu->iowait_boost * max_cap) >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
+ boost = uclamp_rq_util_with(cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu), boost, NULL);
+ if (sg_cpu->util < boost)
+ sg_cpu->util = boost;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
@@ -339,7 +328,7 @@ static inline bool sugov_cpu_is_busy(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu) { return false; }
*/
static inline void ignore_dl_rate_limit(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
{
- if (cpu_bw_dl(cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu)) > sg_cpu->bw_min)
+ if (cpu_bw_dl(cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu)) > sg_cpu->bw_dl)
sg_cpu->sg_policy->limits_changed = true;
}
@@ -347,8 +336,6 @@ static inline bool sugov_update_single_common(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu,
u64 time, unsigned long max_cap,
unsigned int flags)
{
- unsigned long boost;
-
sugov_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags);
sg_cpu->last_update = time;
@@ -357,8 +344,8 @@ static inline bool sugov_update_single_common(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu,
if (!sugov_should_update_freq(sg_cpu->sg_policy, time))
return false;
- boost = sugov_iowait_apply(sg_cpu, time, max_cap);
- sugov_get_util(sg_cpu, boost);
+ sugov_get_util(sg_cpu);
+ sugov_iowait_apply(sg_cpu, time, max_cap);
return true;
}
@@ -442,8 +429,8 @@ static void sugov_update_single_perf(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
sugov_cpu_is_busy(sg_cpu) && sg_cpu->util < prev_util)
sg_cpu->util = prev_util;
- cpufreq_driver_adjust_perf(sg_cpu->cpu, sg_cpu->bw_min,
- sg_cpu->util, max_cap);
+ cpufreq_driver_adjust_perf(sg_cpu->cpu, map_util_perf(sg_cpu->bw_dl),
+ map_util_perf(sg_cpu->util), max_cap);
sg_cpu->sg_policy->last_freq_update_time = time;
}
@@ -459,10 +446,9 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shared(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time)
for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
struct sugov_cpu *j_sg_cpu = &per_cpu(sugov_cpu, j);
- unsigned long boost;
- boost = sugov_iowait_apply(j_sg_cpu, time, max_cap);
- sugov_get_util(j_sg_cpu, boost);
+ sugov_get_util(j_sg_cpu);
+ sugov_iowait_apply(j_sg_cpu, time, max_cap);
util = max(j_sg_cpu->util, util);
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 533547e3c90a..f2bb83675e4a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7820,7 +7820,7 @@ static inline void eenv_pd_busy_time(struct energy_env *eenv,
for_each_cpu(cpu, pd_cpus) {
unsigned long util = cpu_util(cpu, p, -1, 0);
- busy_time += effective_cpu_util(cpu, util, NULL, NULL);
+ busy_time += effective_cpu_util(cpu, util, ENERGY_UTIL, NULL);
}
eenv->pd_busy_time = min(eenv->pd_cap, busy_time);
@@ -7843,7 +7843,7 @@ eenv_pd_max_util(struct energy_env *eenv, struct cpumask *pd_cpus,
for_each_cpu(cpu, pd_cpus) {
struct task_struct *tsk = (cpu == dst_cpu) ? p : NULL;
unsigned long util = cpu_util(cpu, p, dst_cpu, 1);
- unsigned long eff_util, min, max;
+ unsigned long eff_util;
/*
* Performance domain frequency: utilization clamping
@@ -7852,23 +7852,7 @@ eenv_pd_max_util(struct energy_env *eenv, struct cpumask *pd_cpus,
* NOTE: in case RT tasks are running, by default the
* FREQUENCY_UTIL's utilization can be max OPP.
*/
- eff_util = effective_cpu_util(cpu, util, &min, &max);
-
- /* Task's uclamp can modify min and max value */
- if (tsk && uclamp_is_used()) {
- min = max(min, uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MIN));
-
- /*
- * If there is no active max uclamp constraint,
- * directly use task's one, otherwise keep max.
- */
- if (uclamp_rq_is_idle(cpu_rq(cpu)))
- max = uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX);
- else
- max = max(max, uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX));
- }
-
- eff_util = sugov_effective_cpu_perf(cpu, eff_util, min, max);
+ eff_util = effective_cpu_util(cpu, util, FREQUENCY_UTIL, tsk);
max_util = max(max_util, eff_util);
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 001fe047bd5d..eb7e07a1abcc 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -3005,14 +3005,24 @@ static inline void cpufreq_update_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int flags) {}
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+/**
+ * enum cpu_util_type - CPU utilization type
+ * @FREQUENCY_UTIL: Utilization used to select frequency
+ * @ENERGY_UTIL: Utilization used during energy calculation
+ *
+ * The utilization signals of all scheduling classes (CFS/RT/DL) and IRQ time
+ * need to be aggregated differently depending on the usage made of them. This
+ * enum is used within effective_cpu_util() to differentiate the types of
+ * utilization expected by the callers, and adjust the aggregation accordingly.
+ */
+enum cpu_util_type {
+ FREQUENCY_UTIL,
+ ENERGY_UTIL,
+};
+
unsigned long effective_cpu_util(int cpu, unsigned long util_cfs,
- unsigned long *min,
- unsigned long *max);
-
-unsigned long sugov_effective_cpu_perf(int cpu, unsigned long actual,
- unsigned long min,
- unsigned long max);
-
+ enum cpu_util_type type,
+ struct task_struct *p);
/*
* Verify the fitness of task @p to run on @cpu taking into account the
@@ -3069,6 +3079,59 @@ static inline bool uclamp_rq_is_idle(struct rq *rq)
return rq->uclamp_flags & UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE;
}
+/**
+ * uclamp_rq_util_with - clamp @util with @rq and @p effective uclamp values.
+ * @rq: The rq to clamp against. Must not be NULL.
+ * @util: The util value to clamp.
+ * @p: The task to clamp against. Can be NULL if you want to clamp
+ * against @rq only.
+ *
+ * Clamps the passed @util to the max(@rq, @p) effective uclamp values.
+ *
+ * If sched_uclamp_used static key is disabled, then just return the util
+ * without any clamping since uclamp aggregation at the rq level in the fast
+ * path is disabled, rendering this operation a NOP.
+ *
+ * Use uclamp_eff_value() if you don't care about uclamp values at rq level. It
+ * will return the correct effective uclamp value of the task even if the
+ * static key is disabled.
+ */
+static __always_inline
+unsigned long uclamp_rq_util_with(struct rq *rq, unsigned long util,
+ struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ unsigned long min_util = 0;
+ unsigned long max_util = 0;
+
+ if (!static_branch_likely(&sched_uclamp_used))
+ return util;
+
+ if (p) {
+ min_util = uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MIN);
+ max_util = uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX);
+
+ /*
+ * Ignore last runnable task's max clamp, as this task will
+ * reset it. Similarly, no need to read the rq's min clamp.
+ */
+ if (uclamp_rq_is_idle(rq))
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ min_util = max_t(unsigned long, min_util, uclamp_rq_get(rq, UCLAMP_MIN));
+ max_util = max_t(unsigned long, max_util, uclamp_rq_get(rq, UCLAMP_MAX));
+out:
+ /*
+ * Since CPU's {min,max}_util clamps are MAX aggregated considering
+ * RUNNABLE tasks with _different_ clamps, we can end up with an
+ * inversion. Fix it now when the clamps are applied.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(min_util >= max_util))
+ return min_util;
+
+ return clamp(util, min_util, max_util);
+}
+
/* Is the rq being capped/throttled by uclamp_max? */
static inline bool uclamp_rq_is_capped(struct rq *rq)
{
@@ -3106,6 +3169,13 @@ static inline unsigned long uclamp_eff_value(struct task_struct *p,
return SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
}
+static inline
+unsigned long uclamp_rq_util_with(struct rq *rq, unsigned long util,
+ struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ return util;
+}
+
static inline bool uclamp_rq_is_capped(struct rq *rq) { return false; }
static inline bool uclamp_is_used(void)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists