[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ba5ab3c-80ae-448f-9377-01087ec9e858@moroto.mountain>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:04:59 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>
Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, "cocci@...ia.fr" <cocci@...ia.fr>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Drivers: hv: vmbus: One function call less in
create_gpadl_header() after error detection
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 10:17:17PM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote:
> From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2024 10:38 AM
> >
> > The second half of the if statement is basically duplicated. It doesn't
> > need to be treated as a special case. We could do something like below.
> > I deliberately didn't delete the tabs. Also I haven't tested it.
>
> Indeed! I looked at the history, and this function has been
> structured with the duplication since sometime in 2010, which
> pre-dates my involvement by several years. I don't know of
> any reason why the duplication is needed, and agree it could
> be eliminated.
>
> Assuming Markus is OK with my proposal on the handling of
> memory allocation failures, a single patch could simplify this
> function quite a bit.
>
> Dan -- do you want to create and submit the patch? I'll test the
> code on Hyper-V. Or I can create, test, and submit the patch with
> a "Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter".
I messed up the if statement the first couple times I tried to think
about it so I don't trust myself here. Could you give me the
Suggested-by tag?
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists