[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZZ+fiUZolz3jogcE@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:58:01 +0100
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] PM: sleep: Restore asynchronous device resume
optimization
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 03:05:07PM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 01:33:07PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > I would consider different naming just to make clear this
> > > is regarding async call, in_progress looks too generic for me.
> >
> > OK, what about async_in_progress?
> Sure, that better.
Even better would be using_async IMO, because we don't know if
async call is in progress or finish or before start.
Regards
Stanislaw
Powered by blists - more mailing lists