Message-ID: <6650d3a6d757cc1a253d10163474c379c9f6db94.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 01:50:20 +0000
From: CK Hu (胡俊光) <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
To: "jassisinghbrar@...il.com" <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
	"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) <Jason-JH.Lin@...iatek.com>,
	"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, "chunkuang.hu@...nel.org"
	<chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Singo Chang (張興國) <Singo.Chang@...iatek.com>,
	Johnson Wang (王聖鑫) <Johnson.Wang@...iatek.com>,
	Jason-ch Chen (陳建豪)
	<Jason-ch.Chen@...iatek.com>, Shawn Sung (宋孝謙)
	<Shawn.Sung@...iatek.com>, Nancy Lin (林欣螢)
	<Nancy.Lin@...iatek.com>, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
	<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mailbox: mtk-cmdq: Change GCE hardware timeout to
 software timeout

Hi, Jason:

On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 23:51 +0800, Jason-JH.Lin wrote:
> GCE axi_clock 156MHz, 1 tick cycle = 6.41ns.
> 
> The register CMDQ_INSTN_TIMEOUT_CYCLES is a GCE hardware
> configuration
> for instruction timeout cycles. It's the cycles to issue instruction
> timeout interrupt for wait and poll instructions.
> 
> This timeout setting is coarse-grain and has 100% uncertainty,
> which means that if it is set to 16 cycles, the timeout will be
> reduced
> from 16 * 2 = 32 cycles to 16 cycles.
> If it is set to 64 cycles, the timeout will be reduced from 64 * 2 =
> 128
> cycles to 64 cycles.
> 
> Current CMDQ_INSTN_TIMEOUT_CYCLES is set to 22, it means instruction
> timeout is reduced from 2^22 * 2 * 6.41ns = 53.8ms to 26.9ms.
> 
> Since the max value of CMDQ_INSTN_TIMEOUT_CYCLES is 27, it means the
> max
> instruction timeout is reduced from 2^27 * 2 * 6.41ns = 1720ms to
> 860ms.
> 
> It's not enough for the use case of ISP driver below:
> GCE Thread A: wait for SOF and set event 1.
> GCE Thread B: wait for event 1 and set event 2.
> GCE Thread C: wait for event 2 and set event 3.
> GCE Thread D: wait for event 3 and set event 4.
> GCE Thread E: wait for event 4 and set EOF.
> If all GCE Threads start at the same time, the latest GCE Thread E
> will
> wait for event more than 2 seconds.

So wasting design. I could use one GCE thread to do this because they
does jobs sequentially.

About the timeout, I would like the client driver to process the
timeout. For example, if one client driver has send 2 packet, the first
one should run less than 1 ms, the second one should run less 500 ms,
different packet has different timeout value, only the client driver
could process different timeout value for each packet. I think
different client driver would have different timeout process method.
The drm driver use vblank count to decide timeout. So the timeout would
vary by client driver. Therefore, it's better that client driver to
process the timeout. In this case, let ISP driver to setup timer to
detect timeout and gce driver is not necessary to do any modification.

Regards,
CK

> 
> Therefore, we changed the hardware timeout to software timeout,
> making it
> longer, more certain, and making it configurable by CMDQ client
> drivers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c       | 172
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h |   3 +
>  2 files changed, 175 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> index de862e9137d5..89567f837513 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,9 @@
>  #include <linux/iopoll.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/timer.h>
> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/clock.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>  #include <linux/mailbox_controller.h>
> @@ -64,6 +67,11 @@ struct cmdq_thread {
>  	void __iomem		*base;
>  	struct list_head	task_busy_list;
>  	u32			priority;
> +	u32			idx;
> +	struct timer_list	timeout;
> +	u32			timeout_ms;
> +	struct work_struct	timeout_work;
> +	u64			timer_mod;
>  };
>  
>  struct cmdq_task {
> @@ -83,6 +91,7 @@ struct cmdq {
>  	struct cmdq_thread	*thread;
>  	struct clk_bulk_data	clocks[CMDQ_GCE_NUM_MAX];
>  	bool			suspended;
> +	struct workqueue_struct	*timeout_wq;
>  };
>  
>  struct gce_plat {
> @@ -288,6 +297,158 @@ static void cmdq_thread_irq_handler(struct cmdq
> *cmdq,
>  
>  	if (list_empty(&thread->task_busy_list))
>  		cmdq_thread_disable(cmdq, thread);
> +
> +	if (!task) {
> +		cmdq_thread_disable(cmdq, thread);
> +		pr_debug("empty task thread:%u", thread->idx);
> +	} else {
> +		mod_timer(&thread->timeout, jiffies +
> +			  msecs_to_jiffies(thread->timeout_ms));
> +		thread->timer_mod = sched_clock();
> +		pr_debug("mod_timer pkt:0x%p timeout:%u thread:%u",
> +			 task->pkt, thread->timeout_ms, thread->idx);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static bool cmdq_thread_timeout_exceed(struct cmdq_thread *thread)
> +{
> +	u64 duration;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If the first execution time stamp is smaller than timeout
> value,
> +	 * it is the last round of timeout. Skip it.
> +	 */
> +	duration = div_s64(sched_clock() - thread->timer_mod, 1000000);
> +	if (duration < thread->timeout_ms) {
> +		mod_timer(&thread->timeout, jiffies +
> +			  msecs_to_jiffies(thread->timeout_ms -
> duration));
> +		thread->timer_mod = sched_clock();
> +		pr_debug("thread:%u mod time:%llu dur:%llu timeout not
> exceed",
> +			 thread->idx, thread->timer_mod, duration);
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static void cmdq_thread_handle_timeout_work(struct work_struct
> *work_item)
> +{
> +	struct cmdq_thread *thread = container_of(work_item,
> +	struct cmdq_thread, timeout_work);
> +	struct cmdq *cmdq = container_of(thread->chan->mbox, struct
> cmdq, mbox);
> +	struct cmdq_task *task, *tmp, *timeout_task = NULL;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	dma_addr_t pa_curr;
> +	struct list_head removes;
> +
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&removes);
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&thread->chan->lock, flags);
> +
> +	if (list_empty(&thread->task_busy_list)) {
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&thread->chan->lock, flags);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Check before suspending thread to prevent performance
> penalty. */
> +	if (!cmdq_thread_timeout_exceed(thread)) {
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&thread->chan->lock, flags);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	WARN_ON(cmdq_thread_suspend(cmdq, thread) < 0);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Although IRQ is disabled, GCE continues to execute.
> +	 * It may have pending IRQ before GCE thread is suspended,
> +	 * so check this condition again.
> +	 */
> +	cmdq_thread_irq_handler(cmdq, thread);
> +
> +	if (list_empty(&thread->task_busy_list)) {
> +		pr_err("thread:%u empty after irq handle in timeout",
> thread->idx);
> +		goto unlock_free_done;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* After IRQ, the first task may change. */
> +	if (!cmdq_thread_timeout_exceed(thread)) {
> +		cmdq_thread_resume(thread);
> +		goto unlock_free_done;
> +	}
> +
> +	pr_err("timeout for thread:0x%p idx:%u", thread->base, thread-
> >idx);
> +
> +	pa_curr = readl(thread->base + CMDQ_THR_CURR_ADDR) << cmdq-
> >pdata->shift;
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(task, tmp, &thread->task_busy_list,
> +				 list_entry) {
> +		u32 task_end_pa = task->pa_base + task->pkt-
> >cmd_buf_size;
> +
> +		if (pa_curr >= task->pa_base && pa_curr < task_end_pa)
> {
> +			timeout_task = task;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		pr_info("ending not curr in timeout pkt:0x%p
> curr_pa:%pa", task->pkt, &pa_curr);
> +		cmdq_task_exec_done(task, 0);
> +		kfree(task);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (timeout_task) {
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&thread->chan->lock, flags);
> +
> +		cmdq_task_exec_done(timeout_task, -ETIMEDOUT);
> +
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&thread->chan->lock, flags);
> +
> +		task = list_first_entry_or_null(&thread-
> >task_busy_list,
> +						struct cmdq_task,
> list_entry);
> +		if (timeout_task == task) {
> +			cmdq_task_exec_done(task, -ETIMEDOUT);
> +			kfree(task);
> +		} else {
> +			pr_err("task list changed");
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	task = list_first_entry_or_null(&thread->task_busy_list,
> +					struct cmdq_task, list_entry);
> +	if (task) {
> +		mod_timer(&thread->timeout, jiffies +
> +			  msecs_to_jiffies(thread->timeout_ms));
> +		thread->timer_mod = sched_clock();
> +		cmdq_thread_reset(cmdq, thread);
> +		cmdq_thread_resume(thread);
> +	} else {
> +		cmdq_thread_resume(thread);
> +		cmdq_thread_disable(cmdq, thread);
> +		pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(cmdq->mbox.dev);
> +	}
> +
> +unlock_free_done:
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&thread->chan->lock, flags);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(task, tmp, &removes, list_entry) {
> +		list_del(&task->list_entry);
> +		kfree(task);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void cmdq_thread_handle_timeout(struct timer_list *t)
> +{
> +	struct cmdq_thread *thread = from_timer(thread, t, timeout);
> +	struct cmdq *cmdq = container_of(thread->chan->mbox, struct
> cmdq, mbox);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	bool empty;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&thread->chan->lock, flags);
> +	empty = list_empty(&thread->task_busy_list);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&thread->chan->lock, flags);
> +
> +	if (empty || work_pending(&thread->timeout_work))
> +		return;
> +
> +	pr_debug("queue cmdq timeout thread:%u", thread->idx);
> +	queue_work(cmdq->timeout_wq, &thread->timeout_work);
>  }
>  
>  static irqreturn_t cmdq_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev)
> @@ -426,6 +587,11 @@ static int cmdq_mbox_send_data(struct mbox_chan
> *chan, void *data)
>  		writel(thread->priority, thread->base +
> CMDQ_THR_PRIORITY);
>  		writel(CMDQ_THR_IRQ_EN, thread->base +
> CMDQ_THR_IRQ_ENABLE);
>  		writel(CMDQ_THR_ENABLED, thread->base +
> CMDQ_THR_ENABLE_TASK);
> +		if (thread->timeout_ms != CMDQ_NO_TIMEOUT) {
> +			mod_timer(&thread->timeout, jiffies +
> +				  msecs_to_jiffies(thread-
> >timeout_ms));
> +			thread->timer_mod = sched_clock();
> +		}
>  	} else {
>  		WARN_ON(cmdq_thread_suspend(cmdq, thread) < 0);
>  		curr_pa = readl(thread->base + CMDQ_THR_CURR_ADDR) <<
> @@ -657,10 +823,14 @@ static int cmdq_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < cmdq->pdata->thread_nr; i++) {
> +		cmdq->thread[i].idx = i;
>  		cmdq->thread[i].base = cmdq->base + CMDQ_THR_BASE +
>  				CMDQ_THR_SIZE * i;
> +		cmdq->thread[i].timeout_ms = CMDQ_TIMEOUT_DEFAULT;
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cmdq->thread[i].task_busy_list);
>  		cmdq->mbox.chans[i].con_priv = (void *)&cmdq-
> >thread[i];
> +		timer_setup(&cmdq->thread[i].timeout,
> cmdq_thread_handle_timeout, 0);
> +		INIT_WORK(&cmdq->thread[i].timeout_work,
> cmdq_thread_handle_timeout_work);
>  	}
>  
>  	err = devm_mbox_controller_register(dev, &cmdq->mbox);
> @@ -669,6 +839,8 @@ static int cmdq_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
>  		return err;
>  	}
>  
> +	cmdq->timeout_wq =
> create_singlethread_workqueue("cmdq_timeout_handler");
> +
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cmdq);
>  
>  	WARN_ON(clk_bulk_prepare(cmdq->pdata->gce_num, cmdq->clocks));
> diff --git a/include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h
> b/include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h
> index a8f0070c7aa9..4973b2ec37db 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
>  #define CMDQ_WFE_WAIT			BIT(15)
>  #define CMDQ_WFE_WAIT_VALUE		0x1
>  
> +#define CMDQ_TIMEOUT_DEFAULT		1000
> +#define CMDQ_NO_TIMEOUT			0xffffffff
> +
>  /*
>   * WFE arg_b
>   * bit 0-11: wait value

Powered by blists - more mailing lists