linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] ACPI: Enable ACPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 12:16:06 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
	Atish Kumar Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] ACPI: Enable ACPI_PROCESSOR for RISC-V

On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:00:12AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:

[...]

> Also, interestingly, it looks like this ancient line
>
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR)    += processor.o
>
> in drivers/acpi/Makefile should be removed,

No

> since there's no drivers/acpi/processor.c file.

Correct, but ..

> I guess the make process silently filters object files which don't have
> corresponding source files?

May be, but I doubt if that is the case here.

processor.o is just aggregation of all processor_*.o and this will be
the processor.ko when built as a module.

--
Regards,
Sudeep