[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtCR5U++CF93aUq8i+j9G5nLRvUUbCESX=CwemYu9LKOqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 14:04:04 +0100
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler fixes
On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 at 12:09, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>
> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 14:41, Linus Torvalds
> > <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > It's one of these two:
> > >
> > > f12560779f9d sched/cpufreq: Rework iowait boost
> > > 9c0b4bb7f630 sched/cpufreq: Rework schedutil governor performance estimation
> > >
> > > one more boot to go, then I'll try to revert whichever causes my
> > > machine to perform horribly much worse.
> >
> > I guess it should come as no surprise that the result is
> >
> > 9c0b4bb7f6303c9c4e2e34984c46f5a86478f84d is the first bad commit
> >
> > but to revert cleanly I will have to revert all of
> >
> > b3edde44e5d4 ("cpufreq/schedutil: Use a fixed reference frequency")
> > f12560779f9d ("sched/cpufreq: Rework iowait boost")
> > 9c0b4bb7f630 ("sched/cpufreq: Rework schedutil governor
> > performance estimation")
> >
> > This is on a 32-core (64-thread) AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, fwiw.
> >
> > I'll keep that revert in my private test-tree for now (so that I have
> > a working machine again), but I'll move it to my main branch soon
> > unless somebody has a quick fix for this problem.
>
> Thanks a lot for bisecting this, and ack on the revert in any case, these
> are relatively fresh changes that clearly didn't get enough testing - sorry!
b3edde44e5d4 ("cpufreq/schedutil: Use a fixed reference frequency") is
linked with other patches.
I can provide a clean revert of only :
f12560779f9d ("sched/cpufreq: Rework iowait boost")
9c0b4bb7f630 ("sched/cpufreq: Rework schedutil governor performance estimation")
if the fix that i proposed doesn't work:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZZ+ixagkxRPYyTCE@vingu-book/
>
> I also made the revert in sched/urgent & added a changelog, which you can
> pull from:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched-urgent-2024-01-11
>
> # HEAD: 250ce3c1169743f3575cc5937fccd72380052795 Revert "sched/cpufreq: Rework schedutil governor performance estimation" and dependent commits
>
> Revert recent changes to the sched_util logic, to address a bad
> performance regression that increased kernel build time on Linus's
> 64-CPU desktop system substantially.
>
> Lightly build and boot tested.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
>
> ------------------>
> Ingo Molnar (1):
> Revert "sched/cpufreq: Rework schedutil governor performance estimation" and dependent commits
>
>
> include/linux/energy_model.h | 1 +
> kernel/sched/core.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 90 ++++++++++++----------------------------
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 22 ++--------
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 5 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists