| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20240111154922.600919-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:49:22 -0500
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/rseq: Do not skip !allowed_cpus for mm_cid
Indexing with mm_cid is incompatible with skipping disallowed cpumask,
because concurrency IDs are based on a virtual ID allocation which is
unrelated to the physical CPU mask.
These issues can be reproduced by running the rseq selftests under a
taskset which excludes CPU 0, e.g.
taskset -c 10-20 ./run_param_test.sh
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
---
.../selftests/rseq/basic_percpu_ops_test.c | 14 ++++++++++--
tools/testing/selftests/rseq/param_test.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/basic_percpu_ops_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/basic_percpu_ops_test.c
index 887542961968..2348d2c20d0a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/basic_percpu_ops_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/basic_percpu_ops_test.c
@@ -24,6 +24,11 @@ bool rseq_validate_cpu_id(void)
{
return rseq_mm_cid_available();
}
+static
+bool rseq_use_cpu_index(void)
+{
+ return false; /* Use mm_cid */
+}
#else
# define RSEQ_PERCPU RSEQ_PERCPU_CPU_ID
static
@@ -36,6 +41,11 @@ bool rseq_validate_cpu_id(void)
{
return rseq_current_cpu_raw() >= 0;
}
+static
+bool rseq_use_cpu_index(void)
+{
+ return true; /* Use cpu_id as index. */
+}
#endif
struct percpu_lock_entry {
@@ -274,7 +284,7 @@ void test_percpu_list(void)
/* Generate list entries for every usable cpu. */
sched_getaffinity(0, sizeof(allowed_cpus), &allowed_cpus);
for (i = 0; i < CPU_SETSIZE; i++) {
- if (!CPU_ISSET(i, &allowed_cpus))
+ if (rseq_use_cpu_index() && !CPU_ISSET(i, &allowed_cpus))
continue;
for (j = 1; j <= 100; j++) {
struct percpu_list_node *node;
@@ -299,7 +309,7 @@ void test_percpu_list(void)
for (i = 0; i < CPU_SETSIZE; i++) {
struct percpu_list_node *node;
- if (!CPU_ISSET(i, &allowed_cpus))
+ if (rseq_use_cpu_index() && !CPU_ISSET(i, &allowed_cpus))
continue;
while ((node = __percpu_list_pop(&list, i))) {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/param_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/param_test.c
index 20403d58345c..2f37961240ca 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/param_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/param_test.c
@@ -288,6 +288,11 @@ bool rseq_validate_cpu_id(void)
{
return rseq_mm_cid_available();
}
+static
+bool rseq_use_cpu_index(void)
+{
+ return false; /* Use mm_cid */
+}
# ifdef TEST_MEMBARRIER
/*
* Membarrier does not currently support targeting a mm_cid, so
@@ -312,6 +317,11 @@ bool rseq_validate_cpu_id(void)
{
return rseq_current_cpu_raw() >= 0;
}
+static
+bool rseq_use_cpu_index(void)
+{
+ return true; /* Use cpu_id as index. */
+}
# ifdef TEST_MEMBARRIER
static
int rseq_membarrier_expedited(int cpu)
@@ -715,7 +725,7 @@ void test_percpu_list(void)
/* Generate list entries for every usable cpu. */
sched_getaffinity(0, sizeof(allowed_cpus), &allowed_cpus);
for (i = 0; i < CPU_SETSIZE; i++) {
- if (!CPU_ISSET(i, &allowed_cpus))
+ if (rseq_use_cpu_index() && !CPU_ISSET(i, &allowed_cpus))
continue;
for (j = 1; j <= 100; j++) {
struct percpu_list_node *node;
@@ -752,7 +762,7 @@ void test_percpu_list(void)
for (i = 0; i < CPU_SETSIZE; i++) {
struct percpu_list_node *node;
- if (!CPU_ISSET(i, &allowed_cpus))
+ if (rseq_use_cpu_index() && !CPU_ISSET(i, &allowed_cpus))
continue;
while ((node = __percpu_list_pop(&list, i))) {
@@ -902,7 +912,7 @@ void test_percpu_buffer(void)
/* Generate list entries for every usable cpu. */
sched_getaffinity(0, sizeof(allowed_cpus), &allowed_cpus);
for (i = 0; i < CPU_SETSIZE; i++) {
- if (!CPU_ISSET(i, &allowed_cpus))
+ if (rseq_use_cpu_index() && !CPU_ISSET(i, &allowed_cpus))
continue;
/* Worse-case is every item in same CPU. */
buffer.c[i].array =
@@ -952,7 +962,7 @@ void test_percpu_buffer(void)
for (i = 0; i < CPU_SETSIZE; i++) {
struct percpu_buffer_node *node;
- if (!CPU_ISSET(i, &allowed_cpus))
+ if (rseq_use_cpu_index() && !CPU_ISSET(i, &allowed_cpus))
continue;
while ((node = __percpu_buffer_pop(&buffer, i))) {
@@ -1113,7 +1123,7 @@ void test_percpu_memcpy_buffer(void)
/* Generate list entries for every usable cpu. */
sched_getaffinity(0, sizeof(allowed_cpus), &allowed_cpus);
for (i = 0; i < CPU_SETSIZE; i++) {
- if (!CPU_ISSET(i, &allowed_cpus))
+ if (rseq_use_cpu_index() && !CPU_ISSET(i, &allowed_cpus))
continue;
/* Worse-case is every item in same CPU. */
buffer.c[i].array =
@@ -1160,7 +1170,7 @@ void test_percpu_memcpy_buffer(void)
for (i = 0; i < CPU_SETSIZE; i++) {
struct percpu_memcpy_buffer_node item;
- if (!CPU_ISSET(i, &allowed_cpus))
+ if (rseq_use_cpu_index() && !CPU_ISSET(i, &allowed_cpus))
continue;
while (__percpu_memcpy_buffer_pop(&buffer, &item, i)) {
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists