[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <185128ab-f229-4b40-91cd-ebdc138e11ac@tuxon.dev>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 10:55:40 +0200
From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Fix double unlock in
rzg2l_dt_subnode_to_map()
Hi, Dan,
Thanks for your patch!
On 10.01.2024 20:41, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> If rzg2l_map_add_config() fails then the error handling calls
> mutex_unlock(&pctrl->mutex) but we're not holding that mutex. Move
> the unlocks to before the gotos to avoid this situation.
>
> Fixes: d3aaa7203a17 ("pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Add pin configuration support for pinmux groups")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> ---
> (Not tested).
I've tested it on RZ/G3S SoC and all is good.
However, I think, to keep the locking scheme unchanged and simpler (FMPOV),
commit d3aaa7203a17 ("pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Add pin configuration
support for pinmux groups") should have been call rzg2l_map_add_config()
just before the mutex is locked. That would be the following diff:
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c
@@ -447,6 +447,16 @@ static int rzg2l_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev
*pctldev,
name = np->name;
}
+ if (num_configs) {
+ ret = rzg2l_map_add_config(&maps[idx], name,
+ PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP,
+ configs, num_configs);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto done;
+
+ idx++;
+ }
+
mutex_lock(&pctrl->mutex);
/* Register a single pin group listing all the pins we read from DT */
@@ -474,16 +484,6 @@ static int rzg2l_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev
*pctldev,
maps[idx].data.mux.function = name;
idx++;
- if (num_configs) {
- ret = rzg2l_map_add_config(&maps[idx], name,
- PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP,
- configs, num_configs);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto remove_group;
-
- idx++;
- }
-
dev_dbg(pctrl->dev, "Parsed %pOF with %d pins\n", np, num_pinmux);
ret = 0;
goto done;
Would you mind doing it like this?
Please, let me know if you want me to handle it.
Thank you,
Claudiu Beznea
>
> drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c
> index 80fb5011c7bb..8bbfb0530538 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c
> @@ -453,7 +453,8 @@ static int rzg2l_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> gsel = pinctrl_generic_add_group(pctldev, name, pins, num_pinmux, NULL);
> if (gsel < 0) {
> ret = gsel;
> - goto unlock;
> + mutex_unlock(&pctrl->mutex);
> + goto done;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -464,6 +465,7 @@ static int rzg2l_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> fsel = pinmux_generic_add_function(pctldev, name, pin_fn, 1, psel_val);
> if (fsel < 0) {
> ret = fsel;
> + mutex_unlock(&pctrl->mutex);
> goto remove_group;
> }
>
> @@ -490,8 +492,6 @@ static int rzg2l_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>
> remove_group:
> pinctrl_generic_remove_group(pctldev, gsel);
> -unlock:
> - mutex_unlock(&pctrl->mutex);
> done:
> *index = idx;
> kfree(configs);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists