[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SA1PR11MB6734789DDF72683C9C783F70A86F2@SA1PR11MB6734.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:51:04 +0000
From: "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com>
To: Xin Li <xin@...or.com>, "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "Yang, Weijiang" <weijiang.yang@...el.com>, "Christopherson,, Sean"
<seanjc@...gle.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "hpa@...or.com"
<hpa@...or.com>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "tglx@...utronix.de"
<tglx@...utronix.de>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "pbonzini@...hat.com"
<pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/2] KVM: VMX: Cleanup VMX basic information defines
and usages
> >> @@ -6964,7 +6975,7 @@ static void nested_vmx_setup_basic(struct
> nested_vmx_msrs *msrs)
> >> VMCS12_REVISION |
> >> VMX_BASIC_TRUE_CTLS |
> >> ((u64)VMCS12_SIZE << VMX_BASIC_VMCS_SIZE_SHIFT) |
> >> - (VMX_BASIC_MEM_TYPE_WB <<
> VMX_BASIC_MEM_TYPE_SHIFT);
> >> + (MEM_TYPE_WB << VMX_BASIC_MEM_TYPE_SHIFT);
> >>
> >
> > ... here, we can remove the two _SHIFT but define below instead:
> >
> > #define VMX_BASIC_VMCS12_SIZE ((u64)VMCS12_SIZE << 32)
> > #define VMX_BASIC_MEM_TYPE_WB (MEM_TYPE_WB << 50)
>
> I personally don't like such names, unless we can name them in a better way.
>
> >
> > And use above two macros in nested_vmx_setup_basic()?
A second thought on this, I agree this is better. And I will post v4.
Thanks!
Xin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists