[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f821ede01547956809576a159476e7ac33b2dd47.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 01:48:49 +0000
From: CK Hu (胡俊光) <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
To: "jstephan@...libre.com" <jstephan@...libre.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>, "linux-media@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "paul.elder@...asonboard.com"
<paul.elder@...asonboard.com>, "mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Andy Hsieh (謝智皓) <Andy.Hsieh@...iatek.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Louis Kuo (郭德寧)
<louis.kuo@...iatek.com>, "laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com"
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, "fsylvestre@...libre.com"
<fsylvestre@...libre.com>, "matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, "pnguyen@...libre.com"
<pnguyen@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] media: platform: mediatek: isp_30: add mediatek
ISP3.0 camsv
Hi, Julien:
On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 15:14 +0100, Julien Stephan wrote:
>
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> From: Phi-bang Nguyen <pnguyen@...libre.com>
>
> This driver provides a path to bypass the SoC ISP so that image data
> coming from the SENINF can go directly into memory without any image
> processing. This allows the use of an external ISP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phi-bang Nguyen <pnguyen@...libre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Sylvestre <fsylvestre@...libre.com>
> [Paul Elder fix irq locking]
> Signed-off-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@...asonboard.com>
> Co-developed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> Co-developed-by: Julien Stephan <jstephan@...libre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Stephan <jstephan@...libre.com>
> ---
[snip]
> +
> +static void mtk_cam_cmos_vf_enable(struct mtk_cam_dev *cam_dev,
> + bool enable, bool pak_en)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = cam_dev->dev;
> + unsigned long flags = 0;
> +
> + if (pm_runtime_get_sync(dev) < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get pm_runtime\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&cam_dev->irqlock, flags);
The comment of cam_dev->irqlock is "Protects the buffer list". Why do
you protect hw_enable/hw_disable? And I think the naming of irqlock
should be changed to 'buf_list_lock'.
Regards,
CK
> + if (enable)
> + (*cam_dev->hw_functions-
> >mtk_cam_cmos_vf_hw_enable)(cam_dev, pak_en);
> + else
> + (*cam_dev->hw_functions-
> >mtk_cam_cmos_vf_hw_disable)(cam_dev, pak_en);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cam_dev->irqlock, flags);
> +
> +out:
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
> +}
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists