[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2lviizgknyxxwa5fg45sv3rfg6h43qvv7w6ae4nptlkm774hcp@4rsdsvwpcq6c>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 19:53:00 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>, Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@...amperecomputing.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Khuong Dinh <khuong@...amperecomputing.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>, Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@...dia.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Jiucheng Xu <jiucheng.xu@...ogic.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] perf: Convert to platform remove callback
returning void
Hey Will,
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 01:50:09PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 09:56:26AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 02:59:00PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > this series converts all drivers below drivers/perf to use
> > > .remove_new(). See commit 5c5a7680e67b ("platform: Provide a remove
> > > callback that returns no value") for an extended explanation and the
> > > eventual goal. The TL;DR; is to make it harder for driver authors to
> > > leak resources without noticing.
> > >
> > > I based the patches on today's next, I had to revert commits
> > > 3115ee021bfb ("arm64: perf: Include threshold control fields in
> > > PMEVTYPER mask") and 816c26754447 ("arm64: perf: Add support for event
> > > counting threshold") to compile test on ARCH=arm (this is a problem in
> > > next, not in my patch series).
> > >
> > > This is merge window material. All patches are pairwise independent of
> > > each other so they can be applied individually. Still it would be great
> > > to let them go in all together.
> >
> > I wonder if this series is still on someone's radar. It didn't appear in
> > next up to now, so I guess it's too late for 6.8-rc1?!
>
> This came in during the holiday period so, by the time I saw it, it was
> too late to land for this merge window. I can pick it up for 6.9 in a few
> weeks, though. I usually start queueing stuff at -rc3.
If it's not lost I'm happy. There are still quite a few more such
changes necessary for other subsystems, so no time pressure from my
side; 6.9 is great.
Cheers
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists