linux-kernel - Re: Deliberately sending partial patch sets?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:59:26 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Deliberately sending partial patch sets?

On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 09:44:00AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 01:59:47PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > That is, the submitter must send the full series, right? Why not partial
> > like above?
> 
> What can anyone do with a partial patch series?  Why would anyone who
> sent that think it would be material that anyone else should do work for
> them and review it when they aren't even sending the whole series?

IMO people will question why there is partial series submitted (and where the
missing patches are) and then ignore it if it becomes a pattern on submitter
side.

> 
> I'm confused as to why you would think that would be acceptable?  What
> are you really asking here?  Hypotheticals only go so far, please point
> at a real instance and we can talk about it there.

Honestly just to scratch my itch.

Thanks for the reply.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)