lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 01:26:57 +0800
From: Yangyu Chen <cyy@...self.name>
To: charlie@...osinc.com
Cc: alexghiti@...osinc.com,
	anup@...infault.org,
	aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
	conor@...nel.org,
	jrtc27@...c27.com,
	konstantin@...uxfoundation.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	mick@....forth.gr,
	palmer@...osinc.com,
	paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
	rdunlap@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/4] RISC-V: mm: Make SV48 the default address space

Hi, Charlie

Although this patchset has been merged I still have some questions about
this patchset. Because it breaks regular mmap if address >= 38 bits on
sv48 / sv57 capable systems like qemu. For example, If a userspace program
wants to mmap an anonymous page to addr=(1<<45) on an sv48 capable system,
it will fail and kernel will mmaped to another sv39 address since it does
not meet the requirement to use sv48 as you wrote:

>	else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48)) \
>		mmap_end = VA_USER_SV48;			\
>	else							\
>		mmap_end = VA_USER_SV39;			\

Then, How can a userspace program create a mmap with a hint if the address
>= (1<<38) after your patch without MAP_FIXED? The only way to do this is
to pass a hint >= (1<<47) on mmap syscall then kernel will return a random
address in sv48 address space but the hint address gets lost. I think this
violate the principle of mmap syscall as kernel should take the hint and
attempt to create the mapping there.

I don't think patching in this way is right. However, if we only revert
this patch, some programs relying on mmap to return address with effective
bits <= 48 will still be an issue and it might expand to other ISAs if
they implement larger virtual address space like RISC-V sv57. A better way
to solve this might be adding a MAP_48BIT flag to mmap like MAP_32BIT has
been introduced for decades.

Thanks,
Yangyu Chen


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ