lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240113224628.377993-2-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 23:46:26 +0100
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: lgirdwood@...il.com,
	broonie@...nel.org,
	Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] regulator: pwm-regulator: Add validity checks in continuous .get_voltage

Continuous regulators can be configured to operate only in a certain
duty cycle range (for example from 0..91%). Add a check to error out if
the duty cycle translates to an unsupported (or out of range) voltage.

Suggested-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
---
Changes from v1 -> v2:
- this patch is new, using suggestions from Uwe


 drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
index 698c420e0869..226ca4c62673 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
@@ -158,6 +158,9 @@ static int pwm_regulator_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	pwm_get_state(drvdata->pwm, &pstate);
 
 	voltage = pwm_get_relative_duty_cycle(&pstate, duty_unit);
+	if (voltage < min(max_uV_duty, min_uV_duty) ||
+	    voltage > max(max_uV_duty, min_uV_duty))
+		return -ENOTRECOVERABLE;
 
 	/*
 	 * The dutycycle for min_uV might be greater than the one for max_uV.
-- 
2.43.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ