linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/4] 6.1.73-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 17:01:16 -0500
From: Slade Watkins <srw@...dewatkins.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org,
 patches@...ts.linux.dev,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
 shuah@...nel.org,
 patches@...nelci.org,
 lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
 Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
 Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
 Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
 Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
 rwarsow@....de,
 conor@...nel.org,
 allen.lkml@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/4] 6.1.73-rc1 review


> On Jan 13, 2024, at 4:50 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

Hi,
6.1.73-rc1 compiled and booted just fine on x86_64, no errors or regressions.

Tested-by: Slade Watkins <srw@...dewatkins.net>

Best,
Slade