linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 RESEND] sched/fair: Do not scan non-movable tasks several times

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240115105052.398761-1-khorenko@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:50:52 +0300
From: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@...tuozzo.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
	Alexander Atanasov <alexander.atanasov@...tuozzo.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@...tuozzo.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 RESEND] sched/fair: Do not scan non-movable tasks several times

If busiest rq is small, nr_running < SCHED_NR_MIGRATE_BREAK and all
tasks are not movable, detach_tasks() should not iterate more than tasks
available in the busiest rq.

Before commit: b0defa7ae03e ("sched/fair: Make sure to try to detach at
least one movable task"), the (env->loop > env->loop_max) condition
prevented us from scanning non-movable tasks more than rq size times,
but after we start checking the LBF_ALL_PINNED flag, the "all tasks are
not movable" case is under threat.

Note: in case all tasks in the rq could not be moved in detach_tasks()
we always increase loop_break by SCHED_NR_MIGRATE_BREAK, so we can step
over loop_max, but i think it's a rare case and does not worth adding
here extra check for rq->nr_running overlimit.

Fixes: b0defa7ae03e ("sched/fair: Make sure to try to detach at least
one movable task")

Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@...tuozzo.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 533547e3c90a..920fb16e6e2f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -11277,7 +11277,6 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
 		.dst_rq		= this_rq,
 		.dst_grpmask    = group_balance_mask(sd->groups),
 		.idle		= idle,
-		.loop_break	= SCHED_NR_MIGRATE_BREAK,
 		.cpus		= cpus,
 		.fbq_type	= all,
 		.tasks		= LIST_HEAD_INIT(env.tasks),
@@ -11324,6 +11323,14 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
 		 */
 		env.loop_max  = min(sysctl_sched_nr_migrate, busiest->nr_running);
 
+more_balance_reset_break:
+		/*
+		 * If busiest rq is small, nr_running < SCHED_NR_MIGRATE_BREAK
+		 * and all tasks are not movable, detach_tasks() should not
+		 * iterate more than tasks available in rq.
+		 */
+		env.loop_break = min(SCHED_NR_MIGRATE_BREAK, busiest->nr_running);
+
 more_balance:
 		rq_lock_irqsave(busiest, &rf);
 		update_rq_clock(busiest);
@@ -11386,13 +11393,12 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
 			env.dst_cpu	 = env.new_dst_cpu;
 			env.flags	&= ~LBF_DST_PINNED;
 			env.loop	 = 0;
-			env.loop_break	 = SCHED_NR_MIGRATE_BREAK;
 
 			/*
 			 * Go back to "more_balance" rather than "redo" since we
 			 * need to continue with same src_cpu.
 			 */
-			goto more_balance;
+			goto more_balance_reset_break;
 		}
 
 		/*
@@ -11418,7 +11424,6 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
 			 */
 			if (!cpumask_subset(cpus, env.dst_grpmask)) {
 				env.loop = 0;
-				env.loop_break = SCHED_NR_MIGRATE_BREAK;
 				goto redo;
 			}
 			goto out_all_pinned;
-- 
2.39.3