lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2d6a1c05-64a3-4985-8a3a-728509cfa2b1@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 22:15:42 +0800
From: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Mathieu Poirier
	<mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin
	<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
CC: Jinlong Mao <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
        Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@...cinc.com>,
        Trilok Soni
	<quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
        Song Chai <quic_songchai@...cinc.com>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <andersson@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] coresight-tpdm: Add msr register support for CMB


On 1/15/2024 5:20 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 15/01/2024 06:20, Tao Zhang wrote:
>>
>> On 1/12/2024 5:43 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>> On 12/01/2024 09:12, Tao Zhang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 12/20/2023 5:06 PM, Tao Zhang wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/19/2023 10:09 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>>>>> On 19/12/2023 06:58, Tao Zhang wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/18/2023 7:02 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 21/11/2023 02:24, Tao Zhang wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Add the nodes for CMB subunit MSR(mux select register) support.
>>>>>>>>> CMB MSRs(mux select registers) is to separate mux,arbitration,
>>>>>>>>> ,interleaving,data packing control from stream filtering control.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mao Jinlong <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>   .../testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-tpdm  | 8 ++
>>>>>>>>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c  | 86 
>>>>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h  | 16 +++-
>>>>>>>>>   3 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> diff --git 
>>>>>>>>> a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-tpdm 
>>>>>>>>> b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-tpdm
>>>>>>>>> index e0b77107be13..914f3fd81525 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-tpdm
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-tpdm
>>>>>>>>> @@ -249,3 +249,11 @@ Description:
>>>>>>>>>           Accepts only one of the 2 values -  0 or 1.
>>>>>>>>>           0 : Disable the timestamp of all trace packets.
>>>>>>>>>           1 : Enable the timestamp of all trace packets.
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +What: /sys/bus/coresight/devices/<tpdm-name>/cmb_msr/msr[0:31]
>>>>>>>>> +Date:        September 2023
>>>>>>>>> +KernelVersion    6.7
>>>>>>>>> +Contact:    Jinlong Mao (QUIC) <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>, 
>>>>>>>>> Tao Zhang (QUIC) <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
>>>>>>>>> +Description:
>>>>>>>>> +        (RW) Set/Get the MSR(mux select register) for the CMB 
>>>>>>>>> subunit
>>>>>>>>> +        TPDM.
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c 
>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>>>>>>>>> index f6cda5616e84..7e331ea436cc 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -86,6 +86,11 @@ static ssize_t 
>>>>>>>>> tpdm_simple_dataset_show(struct device *dev,
>>>>>>>>>               return -EINVAL;
>>>>>>>>>           return sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%x\n",
>>>>>>>>> drvdata->cmb->patt_mask[tpdm_attr->idx]);
>>>>>>>>> +    case CMB_MSR:
>>>>>>>>> +        if (tpdm_attr->idx >= drvdata->cmb_msr_num)
>>>>>>>>> +            return -EINVAL;
>>>>>>>>> +        return sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%x\n",
>>>>>>>>> + drvdata->cmb->msr[tpdm_attr->idx]);
>>>>>>>>>       }
>>>>>>>>>       return -EINVAL;
>>>>>>>>>   }
>>>>>>>>> @@ -162,6 +167,12 @@ static ssize_t 
>>>>>>>>> tpdm_simple_dataset_store(struct device *dev,
>>>>>>>>>           else
>>>>>>>>>               ret = -EINVAL;
>>>>>>>>>           break;
>>>>>>>>> +    case CMB_MSR:
>>>>>>>>> +        if (tpdm_attr->idx < drvdata->cmb_msr_num)
>>>>>>>>> + drvdata->cmb->msr[tpdm_attr->idx] = val;
>>>>>>>>> +        else
>>>>>>>>> +            ret = -EINVAL;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> minor nit: Could we not break from here instead of adding 
>>>>>>>> return -EINVAL
>>>>>>>> for each case ? (I understand it has been done for the existing 
>>>>>>>> cases.
>>>>>>>> But I think we should clean up all of that, including the ones 
>>>>>>>> you added
>>>>>>>> in Patch 5. Similarly for the dataset_show()
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sure, do I also need to change the DSB corresponding code? If 
>>>>>>> so, how about
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> if I add a new patch to the next patch series to change the 
>>>>>>> previous existing cases?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You could fix the existing cases as a preparatory patch of the 
>>>>>> next version of this series. I can pick it up and push it to next 
>>>>>> as I see fit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Got it. I will update this to the next patch series.
>>>>
>>>> Hi Suzuki,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Since the dataset data is configured with spin lock protection, it 
>>>> needs to be unlock before return.
>>>>
>>>> List my modification below. Would you mind help review to see if it 
>>>> is good for you.
>>>>
>>>> static ssize_t tpdm_simple_dataset_store(struct device *dev,
>>>>                       struct device_attribute *attr,
>>>>                       const char *buf,
>>>>                       size_t size)
>>>> {
>>>>      unsigned long val;
>>>>
>>>>      struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
>>>>      struct tpdm_dataset_attribute *tpdm_attr =
>>>>          container_of(attr, struct tpdm_dataset_attribute, attr);
>>>>
>>>>      if (kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val))
>>>>          return -EINVAL;
>>>>
>>>>      spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
>>>
>>> Use guard() to avoid explicit unlock on return and then you don't 
>>> need the spin_unlock() everywhere. It would be done on return from the
>>> function implicitly.
>>>
>>>
>>>>      switch (tpdm_attr->mem) {
>>>>      case DSB_TRIG_PATT:
>>>
>>> With guard() in place:
>>>
>>>     ret = -EINVAL;
>>>
>>>     switch () {
>>>     case XXX:
>>>
>>>        if (tpdm_attr->idx < TPDM_XXXX_IDX) {
>>>            drvdata->dsb->trig_patt[tpdm_attr->idx] = val;
>>>            ret = size;
>>>        }
>>>        break;
>>>     case ...
>>>         ...
>>>     }
>>>
>>>     return ret;
>>
>> Thanks for your suggestion. I will update the code like below.
>>
>> I will update it in the next version of the patch series if it meets 
>> your expectation.
>>
>> static ssize_t tpdm_simple_dataset_store(struct device *dev,
>>                       struct device_attribute *attr,
>>                       const char *buf,
>>                       size_t size)
>> {
>>      unsigned long val;
>>      ssize_t ret = -EINVAL;
>>
>>      struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
>>      struct tpdm_dataset_attribute *tpdm_attr =
>>          container_of(attr, struct tpdm_dataset_attribute, attr);
>>
>>      if (kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val))
>>          return ret;
>>
>>      guard(spinlock)(&drvdata->spinlock);
>>      switch (tpdm_attr->mem) {
>>      case DSB_TRIG_PATT:
>>          if (tpdm_attr->idx < TPDM_DSB_MAX_PATT) {
>>              drvdata->dsb->trig_patt[tpdm_attr->idx] = val;
>>              ret =size;
>>          }
>>          break;
>>      case ...
>>
>>          ...
>>      }
>>      return ret;
>> }
>>
>
> Yes that looks good to me. Please rebase this on to for-next/queue 
> branch on the coresight repository.

Got it. Thanks for your mention.


Best,

Tao

>
> Suzuki
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ