[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <931bcf87-efdf-478f-869b-fcb1260ac1cc@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 22:39:57 +0800
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-cachefs@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
Yue Hu <huyue2@...lpad.com>, Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] erofs: Don't use certain internal folio_*()
functions
Hi Matthew,
On 2024/1/15 22:06, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 04:33:37PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
>> From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
>>
>> Filesystems should use folio->index and folio->mapping, instead of
>> folio_index(folio), folio_mapping() and folio_file_mapping() since
>> they know that it's in the pagecache.
>>
>> Change this automagically with:
>>
>> perl -p -i -e 's/folio_mapping[(]([^)]*)[)]/\1->mapping/g' fs/erofs/*.c
>> perl -p -i -e 's/folio_file_mapping[(]([^)]*)[)]/\1->mapping/g' fs/erofs/*.c
>> perl -p -i -e 's/folio_index[(]([^)]*)[)]/\1->index/g' fs/erofs/*.c
>>
>> Reported-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
>> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Yue Hu <huyue2@...lpad.com>
>> Cc: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> Cc: linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org
>> Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I tend to apply this patch upstream since compressed data fscache
>> adaption touches this part too. If there is no objection, I'm
>> going to take this patch separately for -next shortly..
>
> Could you change the subject? It's not that the functions are
> "internal", it's that filesystems don't need to use them because they're
> guaranteed to not see swap pages. Maybe just s/internal/unnecessary/
Yes, the subject line was inherited from the original one.
Such helpers are useful if the type of a folio is unknown,
let me revise it.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists