[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yzh3yw3fsdptmlo4d27zakov3wkqzo35wenro3zaafyagfovuz@mp42k5gyfgcg>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 16:54:14 -0500
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To: Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] spinlock: Fix failing build for PREEMPT_RT
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 05:19:34PM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> Since 1d71b30e1f85 ("sched.h: Move (spin|rwlock)_needbreak() to
> spinlock.h") build fails for PREEMPT_RT, since there is no definition
> available of either spin_needbreak() and rwlock_needbreak().
>
> Since it was moved on the mentioned commit, it was placed inside a
> !PREEMPT_RT part of the code, making it out of reach for an RT kernel.
>
> Fix this by moving code it a few lines down so it can be reached by an
> RT build, where it can also make use of the *_is_contended() definition
> added by the spinlock_rt.h.
>
> Fixes: d1d71b30e1f85 ("sched.h: Move (spin|rwlock)_needbreak() to
> spinlock.h")
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>
I've picked this up - thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists