linux-kernel - [PATCH] drm/tests: mm: Call drm_mm_print in drm_test_mm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240116174602.1019512-1-michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 18:46:02 +0100
From: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@...el.com>
To: <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard
	<mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie
	<airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, "Javier Martinez
 Canillas" <javierm@...hat.com>, Maíra Canal
	<mcanal@...lia.com>, Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@...ux.intel.com>,
	Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/tests: mm: Call drm_mm_print in drm_test_mm_debug

The original intent behind the test was to sanity check whether calling
the debug iterator (drm_mm_print) doesn't cause any problems.
Unfortunately - this call got accidentally removed during KUnit
transition. Restore it.

Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@...el.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c
index 4e9247cf9977f..1eb0c304f9607 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c
@@ -188,13 +188,13 @@ static void drm_test_mm_init(struct kunit *test)
 
 static void drm_test_mm_debug(struct kunit *test)
 {
+	struct drm_printer p = drm_debug_printer(test->name);
 	struct drm_mm mm;
 	struct drm_mm_node nodes[2];
 
 	/* Create a small drm_mm with a couple of nodes and a few holes, and
 	 * check that the debug iterator doesn't explode over a trivial drm_mm.
 	 */
-
 	drm_mm_init(&mm, 0, 4096);
 
 	memset(nodes, 0, sizeof(nodes));
@@ -209,6 +209,9 @@ static void drm_test_mm_debug(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_mm_reserve_node(&mm, &nodes[1]),
 			       "failed to reserve node[0] {start=%lld, size=%lld)\n",
 			       nodes[0].start, nodes[0].size);
+
+	drm_mm_print(&mm, &p);
+	KUNIT_SUCCEED(test);
 }
 
 static bool expect_insert(struct kunit *test, struct drm_mm *mm,
-- 
2.43.0