linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 14/18] tty: serial: samsung: return bool for s3c24xx_serial_console

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPLW+4=O2OaDsC7KNeLPt4UC-OLjD3_VVL1xL6PnrOBPUmcDrw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 12:54:45 -0600
From: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, 
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, 
	andre.draszik@...aro.org, peter.griffin@...aro.org, kernel-team@...roid.com, 
	willmcvicker@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/18] tty: serial: samsung: return bool for s3c24xx_serial_console_txrdy()

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 4:25 AM Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aroorg> wrote:
>
> s3c24xx_serial_console_txrdy() returned just 0 or 1 to indicate whether
> the TX is empty or not. Change its return type to bool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> index 63e993bed296..37c0ba2a122c 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> @@ -2183,7 +2183,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops s3c24xx_serial_pm_ops = {
>
>  static struct uart_port *cons_uart;
>
> -static int
> +static bool
>  s3c24xx_serial_console_txrdy(struct uart_port *port, u32 ufcon)
>  {
>         const struct s3c24xx_uart_info *info = s3c24xx_port_to_info(port);
> @@ -2193,13 +2193,13 @@ s3c24xx_serial_console_txrdy(struct uart_port *port, u32 ufcon)
>                 /* fifo mode - check amount of data in fifo registers... */
>
>                 ufstat = rd_regl(port, S3C2410_UFSTAT);
> -               return (ufstat & info->tx_fifofull) ? 0 : 1;
> +               return !(ufstat & info->tx_fifofull);
>         }
>
>         /* in non-fifo mode, we go and use the tx buffer empty */
>
>         utrstat = rd_regl(port, S3C2410_UTRSTAT);
> -       return (utrstat & S3C2410_UTRSTAT_TXE) ? 1 : 0;
> +       return !!(utrstat & S3C2410_UTRSTAT_TXE);

Again, personally I think !! is just clutters the code here, as the
function already returns bool. Other than that:

Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>

>  }
>
>  static bool
> --
> 2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
>
>