linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] s390/vfio-ap: let 'on_scan_complete' callback filter matrix and update guest's APCB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:07:37 -0500
From: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, jjherne@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
        pasic@...ux.ibm.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
        imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
        kwankhede@...dia.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] s390/vfio-ap: let 'on_scan_complete' callback
 filter matrix and update guest's APCB


On 1/16/24 10:53 AM, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 09:57:25AM -0500, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>> This patch is more of an enhancement as opposed to a bug, so no Fixes.
> The preceding and rest of this series CCs stable@...r.kernel.org and
> would not apply without this patch. So I guess backporting the whole
> series would be difficult.
>
> Whether propagating the prevous patches' Fixes/stable makes any sense?


Let's put it this way; it doesn't not make sense to make this patch 
Fixes/stable. To make life easier to apply the whole series, go ahead 
and add the Fixes/stable tags.


>
> Thanks!