linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 28/31] libbpf: Fix NULL pointer dereference in bpf_object__collect_prog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240116200310.259340-28-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 15:02:37 -0500
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mingyi Zhang <zhangmingyi5@...wei.com>,
	Xin Liu <liuxin350@...wei.com>,
	Changye Wu <wuchangye@...wei.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
	ast@...nel.org,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 28/31] libbpf: Fix NULL pointer dereference in bpf_object__collect_prog_relos

From: Mingyi Zhang <zhangmingyi5@...wei.com>

[ Upstream commit fc3a5534e2a8855427403113cbeb54af5837bbe0 ]

An issue occurred while reading an ELF file in libbpf.c during fuzzing:

	Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
	0x0000000000958e97 in bpf_object.collect_prog_relos () at libbpf.c:4206
	4206 in libbpf.c
	(gdb) bt
	#0 0x0000000000958e97 in bpf_object.collect_prog_relos () at libbpf.c:4206
	#1 0x000000000094f9d6 in bpf_object.collect_relos () at libbpf.c:6706
	#2 0x000000000092bef3 in bpf_object_open () at libbpf.c:7437
	#3 0x000000000092c046 in bpf_object.open_mem () at libbpf.c:7497
	#4 0x0000000000924afa in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput () at fuzz/bpf-object-fuzzer.c:16
	#5 0x000000000060be11 in testblitz_engine::fuzzer::Fuzzer::run_one ()
	#6 0x000000000087ad92 in tracing::span::Span::in_scope ()
	#7 0x00000000006078aa in testblitz_engine::fuzzer::util::walkdir ()
	#8 0x00000000005f3217 in testblitz_engine::entrypoint::main::{{closure}} ()
	#9 0x00000000005f2601 in main ()
	(gdb)

scn_data was null at this code(tools/lib/bpf/src/libbpf.c):

	if (rel->r_offset % BPF_INSN_SZ || rel->r_offset >= scn_data->d_size) {

The scn_data is derived from the code above:

	scn = elf_sec_by_idx(obj, sec_idx);
	scn_data = elf_sec_data(obj, scn);

	relo_sec_name = elf_sec_str(obj, shdr->sh_name);
	sec_name = elf_sec_name(obj, scn);
	if (!relo_sec_name || !sec_name)// don't check whether scn_data is NULL
		return -EINVAL;

In certain special scenarios, such as reading a malformed ELF file,
it is possible that scn_data may be a null pointer

Signed-off-by: Mingyi Zhang <zhangmingyi5@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Liu <liuxin350@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Changye Wu <wuchangye@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231221033947.154564-1-liuxin350@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index b8849812449c..4a62a4f051df 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -1497,6 +1497,8 @@ static int bpf_object__sanitize_and_load_btf(struct bpf_object *obj)
 
 	bpf_object__sanitize_btf(obj);
 	bpf_object__sanitize_btf_ext(obj);
+	if (!scn_data)
+		return -LIBBPF_ERRNO__FORMAT;
 
 	err = btf__load(obj->btf);
 	if (err) {
-- 
2.43.0