linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: display: convert Atmel's HLCDC to DT schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 21:45:19 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@...rochip.com>,
 conor.dooley@...rochip.com, sam@...nborg.org, bbrezillon@...nel.org,
 maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de,
 airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch, robh+dt@...nel.org,
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
 claudiu.beznea@...on.dev, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lee@...nel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
 u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux4microchip@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: display: convert Atmel's HLCDC to DT
 schema

On 16/01/2024 12:37, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote:
> Convert the existing DT binding to DT schema of the Atmel's HLCDC display
> controller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@...rochip.com>
> ---
> changelog
> v1 -> v2
> - Remove the explicit copyrights.
> - Modify filename like compatible.
> - Modify title (drop words like binding/driver).
> - Modify description actually describing the hardware and not the driver.
> - Remove pinctrl properties which aren't required.
> - Ref endpoint and not endpoint-base.
> - Drop redundant info about bus-width description and add ref to video-interfaces.
> - Move 'additionalProperties' after 'Required'.
> - Drop parent node and it's other sub-device node which are not related here.
> - Add compatible to example 2 and add comments that bus-width is the diff between two examples.
> ---

Please respond to review comments and acknowledge you implement each of
them. I don't think you did here everything I pointed out. The next
patch for sure misses things.

Best regards,
Krzysztof