[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240116224041.220740-2-lk@c--e.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:40:39 +0100
From: "Christian A. Ehrhardt" <lk@...e.de>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Christian A. Ehrhardt" <lk@...e.de>,
Dell.Client.Kernel@...l.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Jack Pham <quic_jackp@...cinc.com>,
Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>,
Samuel Čavoj <samuel@...oj.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] usb: ucsi: Add missing ppm_lock
Calling ->sync_write must be done while holding the PPM lock as the
mailbox logic does not support concurrent commands.
Thus protect the only call to ucsi_acknowledge_connector_change
with the PPM lock as it calls ->sync_write. All other calls to
->sync_write already happen under the PPM lock.
Signed-off-by: Christian A. Ehrhardt <lk@...e.de>
---
NOTE: This is not a theoretical issue. I've seen problems resulting
from the missing lock on real hardware.
drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c
index 61b64558f96c..8f9dff993b3d 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c
@@ -935,7 +935,9 @@ static void ucsi_handle_connector_change(struct work_struct *work)
clear_bit(EVENT_PENDING, &con->ucsi->flags);
+ mutex_lock(&ucsi->ppm_lock);
ret = ucsi_acknowledge_connector_change(ucsi);
+ mutex_unlock(&ucsi->ppm_lock);
if (ret)
dev_err(ucsi->dev, "%s: ACK failed (%d)", __func__, ret);
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists