[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240116010422.217925-19-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 20:03:56 -0500
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.7 19/21] ext4: unify the type of flexbg_size to unsigned int
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
[ Upstream commit 658a52344fb139f9531e7543a6e0015b630feb38 ]
The maximum value of flexbg_size is 2^31, but the maximum value of int
is (2^31 - 1), so overflow may occur when the type of flexbg_size is
declared as int.
For example, when uninit_mask is initialized in ext4_alloc_group_tables(),
if flexbg_size == 2^31, the initialized uninit_mask is incorrect, and this
may causes set_flexbg_block_bitmap() to trigger a BUG_ON().
Therefore, the flexbg_size type is declared as unsigned int to avoid
overflow and memory waste.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231023013057.2117948-2-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Stable-dep-of: 5d1935ac02ca ("ext4: avoid online resizing failures due to oversized flex bg")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
fs/ext4/resize.c | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c
index 4fe061edefdd..c6d4539d4c1f 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/resize.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ struct ext4_new_flex_group_data {
*
* Returns NULL on failure otherwise address of the allocated structure.
*/
-static struct ext4_new_flex_group_data *alloc_flex_gd(unsigned long flexbg_size)
+static struct ext4_new_flex_group_data *alloc_flex_gd(unsigned int flexbg_size)
{
struct ext4_new_flex_group_data *flex_gd;
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static void free_flex_gd(struct ext4_new_flex_group_data *flex_gd)
*/
static int ext4_alloc_group_tables(struct super_block *sb,
struct ext4_new_flex_group_data *flex_gd,
- int flexbg_size)
+ unsigned int flexbg_size)
{
struct ext4_new_group_data *group_data = flex_gd->groups;
ext4_fsblk_t start_blk;
@@ -384,12 +384,12 @@ static int ext4_alloc_group_tables(struct super_block *sb,
group = group_data[0].group;
printk(KERN_DEBUG "EXT4-fs: adding a flex group with "
- "%d groups, flexbg size is %d:\n", flex_gd->count,
+ "%u groups, flexbg size is %u:\n", flex_gd->count,
flexbg_size);
for (i = 0; i < flex_gd->count; i++) {
ext4_debug(
- "adding %s group %u: %u blocks (%d free, %d mdata blocks)\n",
+ "adding %s group %u: %u blocks (%u free, %u mdata blocks)\n",
ext4_bg_has_super(sb, group + i) ? "normal" :
"no-super", group + i,
group_data[i].blocks_count,
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ static int ext4_flex_group_add(struct super_block *sb,
static int ext4_setup_next_flex_gd(struct super_block *sb,
struct ext4_new_flex_group_data *flex_gd,
ext4_fsblk_t n_blocks_count,
- unsigned long flexbg_size)
+ unsigned int flexbg_size)
{
struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
struct ext4_super_block *es = sbi->s_es;
@@ -1990,8 +1990,9 @@ int ext4_resize_fs(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t n_blocks_count)
ext4_fsblk_t o_blocks_count;
ext4_fsblk_t n_blocks_count_retry = 0;
unsigned long last_update_time = 0;
- int err = 0, flexbg_size = 1 << sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex;
+ int err = 0;
int meta_bg;
+ unsigned int flexbg_size = ext4_flex_bg_size(sbi);
/* See if the device is actually as big as what was requested */
bh = ext4_sb_bread(sb, n_blocks_count - 1, 0);
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists