linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase supported CPUs to 512

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f84f3e60-e71a-4ea4-8c9c-86fd915129a9@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 15:10:26 +0800
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "Christoph Lameter
 (Ampere)" <cl@...ux.com>
CC: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <Valentin.Schneider@....com>, Vanshidhar Konda
	<vanshikonda@...amperecomputing.com>, Jonathan Cameron
	<Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, Dave Kleikamp
	<dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>, Matteo Carlini <Matteo.Carlini@....com>,
	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <yang@...amperecomputing.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase
 supported CPUs to 512



On 2024/1/15 23:39, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 04:05:56PM -0800, Christoph Lameter (Ampere) wrote:
>> Index: linux/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux.orig/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> +++ linux/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> @@ -1407,7 +1407,21 @@ config SCHED_SMT
>>    config NR_CPUS
>>    	int "Maximum number of CPUs (2-4096)"
>>    	range 2 4096
> 
> I think your mailer got to your patch and messed up the white space.
> There are two spaces before each of these lines rather than the usual
> one.
> 
>> -	default "256"
>> +	default 512
>> +
>> +#
>> +# Determines the placement of cpumasks.
>> +#
>> +# With CPUMASK_OFFSTACK the cpumasks are dynamically allocated.
>> +# Useful for machines with lots of core because it avoids increasing
>> +# the size of many of the data structures in the kernel.
>> +#
>> +# If this is off then the cpumasks have a static sizes and are
>> +# embedded within data structures.
>> +#
>> +config CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
>> +	def_bool y
>> +	depends on NR_CPUS > 256
> 
> Should that be ">= 256" ?

Maybe just select CPUMASK_OFFSTACK if NR_CPUS >= 256,


But could we just make CPUMASK_OFFSTACK configurable and let user/distro
to enable it?

diff --git a/lib/Kconfig b/lib/Kconfig
index 5ddda7c2ed9b..4254be5aa843 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig
+++ b/lib/Kconfig
@@ -535,7 +535,9 @@ config CHECK_SIGNATURE
         bool

  config CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
-       bool "Force CPU masks off stack" if DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
+       bool "Force CPU masks off stack"
+       depends on SMP
+       default n
         help
           Use dynamic allocation for cpumask_var_t, instead of putting
           them on the stack.  This is a bit more expensive, but avoids


> 
>>
>>    config HOTPLUG_CPU
>>    	bool "Support for hot-pluggable CPUs"
> 
> Same here.
>