linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: sophgo: Add clock controller of SG2000 series SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240116-doubling-fanning-2a46405942ae@wendy>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 07:36:58 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>
CC: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Michael Turquette
	<mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
	<robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chao
 Wei <chao.wei@...hgo.com>, Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>, Paul
 Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>, Liu
 Gui <kenneth.liu@...hgo.com>, Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@...il.com>,
	<dlan@...too.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: sophgo: Add clock controller
 of SG2000 series SoC

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 08:27:59AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> >On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 12:16:58PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> >> SG2000 series SoC has the same clock as CV1810 series, but the clock
> >> related to A53 is functional in SG2000 series. So a new compatible
> >> string is needed for the new SoC.
> >>
> >> Add definition for the clock controller of the SG2000 series SoC.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>
> >> Link: https://github.com/sophgo/sophgo-doc/releases/tag/sg2000-datasheet-v1.0-alpha
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml | 3 ++-
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
> >> index c1dc24673c0d..59ef41adb539 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
> >> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> >>  $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml#
> >>  $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >>
> >> -title: Sophgo CV1800 Series Clock Controller
> >> +title: Sophgo CV1800/SG2000 Series Clock Controller
> >>
> >>  maintainers:
> >>    - Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>
> >> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ properties:
> >>      enum:
> >>        - sophgo,cv1800-clk
> >>        - sophgo,cv1810-clk
> >> +      - sophgo,sg2000-clk
> >
> >I recall before you mentioned that the Sophgo folks were considering
> >renaming one of their devices. Is the sg2000 the renamed one, or a
> >different chip?

> The sg2000/sg2002 SoCs have one A53 core which cv1812/cv1813 SoCs
> don't have. I prefer sg2000/sg2002 are different chips, or at least
> an enhanced version of existed cv1812/cv1813. It is not a simple
> rename.
> 
> For this patch, the sg2000 doesn't need to disable A53 related clocks
> like cv18xx series. So this compatible is needed to bind to this new
> logic.

I'm not disputing the unique compatible - you previously mentioned that
Sophgo were considering rebranding the cvXXXX series of chips going
forward and that one particular chip might undergo a name change.
I was wondering if this was that chip or just another device in the
series.

Thanks,
Conor.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)