[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e42818b2-8826-48f8-b9bd-35cbf464a08f@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 08:42:48 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Raphael Gallais-Pou <raphael.gallais-pou@...s.st.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Yannick Fertre <yannick.fertre@...s.st.com>,
Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu@...s.st.com>, David Airlie
<airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: display: add dt-bindings for STM32
LVDS device
On 15/01/2024 17:51, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
>
> On 1/15/24 16:46, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 02:20:04PM +0100, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
>>> Add "st,stm32mp25-lvds" compatible.
>>>
A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "dt-bindings for". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
See also:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18
>>> Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <raphael.gallais-pou@...s.st.com>
>>> ---
>>> Depends on: "dt-bindings: stm32: add clocks and reset binding for
>>> stm32mp25 platform" by Gabriel Fernandez
>>>
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> - Clarify commit dependency
>>> - Fix includes in the example
>>> - Fix YAML
>>> - Add "clock-cells" description
>>> - s/regroups/is composed of/
>>> - Changed compatible to show SoC specificity
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Switch compatible and clock-cells related areas
>>> - Remove faulty #include in the example.
>>> - Add entry in MAINTAINERS
>>> ---
>>> .../bindings/display/st,stm32-lvds.yaml | 119 ++++++++++++++++++
>> Filename matching compatible.
>
> Hi Rob,
>
>
> I was unsure about this.
>
> The driver will eventually support several SoCs with different compatibles,
> wouldn't this be more confusing ?
No. "Eventually" might never happen.
> I also wanted to keep the similarity with the "st,stm32-<ip>.yaml" name for the
> DRM STM drivers. Would that be possible ?
But why? The consistency we want is the filename matching compatible,
not matching other filenames. If you have here multiple devices,
document them *now*.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Raphaƫl
I hope you did not ignore rest of the comments... We expect some sort of
"ack/ok/I'll fix/whatever" message and you wrote nothing further.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists