[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240116074333.GO5185@atomide.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 09:43:33 +0200
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Tom Joseph <tjoseph@...ence.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, gregory.clement@...tlin.com,
theo.lebrun@...tlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
u-kumar1@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] gpio: pca953x: move suspend/resume to
suspend_noirq/resume_noirq
* Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com> [240115 16:16]:
> Some IOs can be needed during suspend_noirq/resume_noirq.
> So move suspend/resume callbacks to noirq.
So have you checked that the pca953x_save_context() and restore works
this way? There's i2c traffic and regulators may sleep.. I wonder if
you instead just need to leave gpio-pca953x enabled in some cases
instead?
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists