[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <feb39d03-bc78-474e-b99c-d835a37dd36b@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 09:41:49 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com, wenst@...omium.org,
hsinyi@...omium.org, nfraprado@...labora.com, macpaul.lin@...iatek.com,
sean.wang@...iatek.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] arm64: dts: mediatek: radxa-nio-12l: Enable System
Companion Processor
Il 16/01/24 09:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
> On 12/01/2024 10:46, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> The SCP is used by the SoC for various tasks, including initializing
>> hardware video encoding/decoding hardware and managing other remote
>> processors. Enable this node and assign its own DMA pool to it.
>>
>
> Please provide reason why this cannot be included in initial submission
> and must be split into separate patch. I really do not understand except
> some patch count stats.
>
This was done to describe both the reasons why each node was enabled at
which point and the actual workflow for the bringup with each commit.
I don't care about the stats.
I will squash some of those patches for v2, anyway.
Regards,
Angelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists