[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <521a2a44-9ec1-4898-aca7-721d07e12643@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:32:00 +0100
From: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>, tfiga@...omium.org,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, mchehab@...nel.org
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: media videobuf2: Stop direct calls to queue
num_buffers field
Le 16/01/2024 à 10:21, Hans Verkuil a écrit :
> On 15/01/2024 18:08, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>> Use vb2_get_num_buffers() to avoid using queue num_buffers field directly.
>> This allows us to change how the number of buffers is computed in the
>> future.
>>
>> Fixes: c838530d230b ("media: media videobuf2: Be more flexible on the number of queue stored buffers")
>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c
>> index 41a832dd1426..b6bf8f232f48 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c
>> @@ -989,7 +989,7 @@ int vb2_core_create_bufs(struct vb2_queue *q, enum vb2_memory memory,
>> bool no_previous_buffers = !q_num_bufs;
>> int ret = 0;
>>
>> - if (q->num_buffers == q->max_num_buffers) {
>> + if (q_num_bufs == q->max_num_buffers) {
>> dprintk(q, 1, "maximum number of buffers already allocated\n");
>> return -ENOBUFS;
>> }
> There is another case in vb2_ioctl_create_bufs() where num_buffers is accessed directly.
> Can you fix that one as well?
It is removed by the patch I have send just after this one:
"media: core: Refactor vb2_ioctl_create_bufs() to always set capabilities flags"
Regards,
Benjamin
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists