[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240116001439.213839-1-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 19:14:29 -0500
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Rui Zhang <zr.zhang@...o.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 1/8] regulator: core: Only increment use_count when enable_count changes
From: Rui Zhang <zr.zhang@...o.com>
[ Upstream commit 7993d3a9c34f609c02171e115fd12c10e2105ff4 ]
The use_count of a regulator should only be incremented when the
enable_count changes from 0 to 1. Similarly, the use_count should
only be decremented when the enable_count changes from 1 to 0.
In the previous implementation, use_count was sometimes decremented
to 0 when some consumer called unbalanced disable,
leading to unexpected disable even the regulator is enabled by
other consumers. With this change, the use_count accurately reflects
the number of users which the regulator is enabled.
This should make things more robust in the case where a consumer does
leak references.
Signed-off-by: Rui Zhang <zr.zhang@...o.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231103074231.8031-1-zr.zhang@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 8ad50dc8fb35..9b1f27f87c95 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -2881,7 +2881,8 @@ static int _regulator_enable(struct regulator *regulator)
/* Fallthrough on positive return values - already enabled */
}
- rdev->use_count++;
+ if (regulator->enable_count == 1)
+ rdev->use_count++;
return 0;
@@ -2956,37 +2957,40 @@ static int _regulator_disable(struct regulator *regulator)
lockdep_assert_held_once(&rdev->mutex.base);
- if (WARN(rdev->use_count <= 0,
+ if (WARN(regulator->enable_count == 0,
"unbalanced disables for %s\n", rdev_get_name(rdev)))
return -EIO;
- /* are we the last user and permitted to disable ? */
- if (rdev->use_count == 1 &&
- (rdev->constraints && !rdev->constraints->always_on)) {
-
- /* we are last user */
- if (regulator_ops_is_valid(rdev, REGULATOR_CHANGE_STATUS)) {
- ret = _notifier_call_chain(rdev,
- REGULATOR_EVENT_PRE_DISABLE,
- NULL);
- if (ret & NOTIFY_STOP_MASK)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- ret = _regulator_do_disable(rdev);
- if (ret < 0) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to disable: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
- _notifier_call_chain(rdev,
- REGULATOR_EVENT_ABORT_DISABLE,
+ if (regulator->enable_count == 1) {
+ /* disabling last enable_count from this regulator */
+ /* are we the last user and permitted to disable ? */
+ if (rdev->use_count == 1 &&
+ (rdev->constraints && !rdev->constraints->always_on)) {
+
+ /* we are last user */
+ if (regulator_ops_is_valid(rdev, REGULATOR_CHANGE_STATUS)) {
+ ret = _notifier_call_chain(rdev,
+ REGULATOR_EVENT_PRE_DISABLE,
+ NULL);
+ if (ret & NOTIFY_STOP_MASK)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ret = _regulator_do_disable(rdev);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ rdev_err(rdev, "failed to disable: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
+ _notifier_call_chain(rdev,
+ REGULATOR_EVENT_ABORT_DISABLE,
+ NULL);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ _notifier_call_chain(rdev, REGULATOR_EVENT_DISABLE,
NULL);
- return ret;
}
- _notifier_call_chain(rdev, REGULATOR_EVENT_DISABLE,
- NULL);
- }
- rdev->use_count = 0;
- } else if (rdev->use_count > 1) {
- rdev->use_count--;
+ rdev->use_count = 0;
+ } else if (rdev->use_count > 1) {
+ rdev->use_count--;
+ }
}
if (ret == 0)
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists