[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPj87rNKLPETVGzpXaZtQwVGauH2V-fCuFGN4zrOE0nH2R+F+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 11:19:44 +0000
From: Daniel Stone <daniel@...ishbar.org>
To: dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Sima Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, David Heidelberg <david.heidelberg@...labora.com>,
guilherme.gallo@...labora.com, sergi.blanch.torne@...labora.com,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] drm/ci: mediatek: Rename exisitng job
Hi Vignesh,
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 at 09:55, Vignesh Raman <vignesh.raman@...labora.com> wrote:
> Rename the name of xfail files for mediatek (mt8173 and mt8183),
> to include information about the tested driver and update xfails
> accordingly. Since the correct driver name is passed from the job to
> test gpu and display driver, remove the check to set IGT_FORCE_DRIVER
> based on driver name.
I think something is still wrong here, because I can see that later
xfails updates are setting expectations on kms tests when we're
supposed to be using the panfrost driver. I can't tell which branch
was used to run this, but you definitely want to look closely at the
job logs and results to find out what's going on here.
Cheers,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists