[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZaamkyuOET+1rOSm@li-008a6a4c-3549-11b2-a85c-c5cc2836eea2.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 16:53:55 +0100
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, jjherne@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
pasic@...ux.ibm.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
kwankhede@...dia.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] s390/vfio-ap: let 'on_scan_complete' callback
filter matrix and update guest's APCB
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 09:57:25AM -0500, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> This patch is more of an enhancement as opposed to a bug, so no Fixes.
The preceding and rest of this series CCs stable@...r.kernel.org and
would not apply without this patch. So I guess backporting the whole
series would be difficult.
Whether propagating the prevous patches' Fixes/stable makes any sense?
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists