linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase supported CPUs to 512

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <affb2c00-695a-47af-77f6-ea1c3f298fb7@linux.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 12:01:13 -0800 (PST)
From: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@...ux.com>
To: Eric Mackay <eric.mackay@...cle.com>
cc: linux@...linux.org.uk, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, Matteo.Carlini@....com, 
    Valentin.Schneider@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, 
    anshuman.khandual@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, 
    dave.kleikamp@...cle.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
    linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, robin.murphy@....com, 
    vanshikonda@...amperecomputing.com, yang@...amperecomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase
 supported CPUs to 512

On Tue, 16 Jan 2024, Eric Mackay wrote:

> Ack. I withdraw my nit.

Alright. Are we done and should I post V2?