Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 15:31:27 -0500
From: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@...cle.com>,
        Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@...hat.com>,
        Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Dragos Tatulea
 <dtatulea@...dia.com>, Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>,
        Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC V1 05/13] vhost-vdpa: VHOST_IOTLB_REMAP

On 1/10/2024 10:08 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 4:40 AM Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com> wrote:
>>
>> When device ownership is passed to a new process via VHOST_NEW_OWNER,
>> some devices need to know the new userland addresses of the dma mappings.
>> Define the new iotlb message type VHOST_IOTLB_REMAP to update the uaddr
>> of a mapping.  The new uaddr must address the same memory object as
>> originally mapped.
>>
>> The user must suspend the device before the old address is invalidated,
>> and cannot resume it until after VHOST_IOTLB_REMAP is called, but this
>> requirement is not enforced by the API.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/vhost/vdpa.c             | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/uapi/linux/vhost_types.h | 11 ++++++++++-
>>  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>> index faed6471934a..ec5ca20bd47d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>> @@ -1219,6 +1219,37 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_pa_map(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
>>
>>  }
>>
>> +static int vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_remap(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
>> +                                         struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb,
>> +                                         struct vhost_iotlb_msg *msg)
>> +{
>> +       struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
>> +       const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config;
>> +       u32 asid = iotlb_to_asid(iotlb);
>> +       u64 start = msg->iova;
>> +       u64 last = start + msg->size - 1;
>> +       struct vhost_iotlb_map *map;
>> +       int r = 0;
>> +
>> +       if (msg->perm || !msg->size)
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +       map = vhost_iotlb_itree_first(iotlb, start, last);
>> +       if (!map)
>> +               return -ENOENT;
>> +
>> +       if (map->start != start || map->last != last)
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +       /* batch will finish with remap.  non-batch must do it now. */
>> +       if (!v->in_batch)
>> +               r = ops->set_map(vdpa, asid, iotlb);
>> +       if (!r)
>> +               map->addr = msg->uaddr;
> 
> I may miss something, for example for PA mapping,
> 
> 1) need to convert uaddr into phys addr
> 2) need to check whether the uaddr is backed by the same page or not?

This code does not verify that the new size@...dr points to the same physical
pages as the old size@...dr.  If the app screws up and they differ, then the app
may corrupt its own memory, but no-one else's.

It would be expensive for large memories to verify page by page, O(npages), and such
verification lies on the critical path for virtual machine downtime during live update.
I could compare the properties of the vma(s) for the old size@...dr vs the vma for the 
new, but that is more complicated and would be a maintenance headache.  When I submitted
such code to Alex W when writing the equivalent patches for vfio, he said don't check,
correctness is the user's responsibility.

- Steve

>> +
>> +       return r;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_update(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
>>                                            struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb,
>>                                            struct vhost_iotlb_msg *msg)
>> @@ -1298,6 +1329,9 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev, u32 asid,
>>                         ops->set_map(vdpa, asid, iotlb);
>>                 v->in_batch = false;
>>                 break;
>> +       case VHOST_IOTLB_REMAP:
>> +               r = vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_remap(v, iotlb, msg);
>> +               break;
>>         default:
>>                 r = -EINVAL;
>>                 break;
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vhost_types.h b/include/uapi/linux/vhost_types.h
>> index 9177843951e9..35908315ff55 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vhost_types.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vhost_types.h
>> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ struct vhost_iotlb_msg {
>>  /*
>>   * VHOST_IOTLB_BATCH_BEGIN and VHOST_IOTLB_BATCH_END allow modifying
>>   * multiple mappings in one go: beginning with
>> - * VHOST_IOTLB_BATCH_BEGIN, followed by any number of
>> + * VHOST_IOTLB_BATCH_BEGIN, followed by any number of VHOST_IOTLB_REMAP or
>>   * VHOST_IOTLB_UPDATE messages, and ending with VHOST_IOTLB_BATCH_END.
>>   * When one of these two values is used as the message type, the rest
>>   * of the fields in the message are ignored. There's no guarantee that
>> @@ -87,6 +87,15 @@ struct vhost_iotlb_msg {
>>   */
>>  #define VHOST_IOTLB_BATCH_BEGIN    5
>>  #define VHOST_IOTLB_BATCH_END      6
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * VHOST_IOTLB_REMAP registers a new uaddr for the existing mapping at iova.
>> + * The new uaddr must address the same memory object as originally mapped.
>> + * Failure to do so will result in user memory corruption and/or device
>> + * misbehavior.  iova and size must match the arguments used to create the
>> + * an existing mapping.  Protection is not changed, and perm must be 0.
>> + */
>> +#define VHOST_IOTLB_REMAP          7
>>         __u8 type;
>>  };
>>
>> --
>> 2.39.3
>>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists