lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024011713-majorette-abridge-56c9@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 06:47:56 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Hoorad Farrokh <hourrad.f@...il.com>
Cc: linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: prism2mgmt: Fixed a parentheses coding style

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:38:13AM +1300, Hoorad Farrokh wrote:
> Fixed a coding style problem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hoorad Farrokh <hourrad.f@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2mgmt.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2mgmt.c b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2mgmt.c
> index d5737166564e..a1adf69ba9f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2mgmt.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2mgmt.c
> @@ -1288,8 +1288,8 @@ int prism2mgmt_wlansniff(struct wlandevice *wlandev, void *msgp)
>  
>  		/* Set the driver state */
>  		/* Do we want the prism2 header? */
> -		if ((msg->prismheader.status ==
> -		     P80211ENUM_msgitem_status_data_ok) &&
> +		if (msg->prismheader.status ==
> +		     P80211ENUM_msgitem_status_data_ok &&
>  		    (msg->prismheader.data == P80211ENUM_truth_true)) {
>  			hw->sniffhdr = 0;
>  			wlandev->netdev->type = ARPHRD_IEEE80211_PRISM;
> -- 
> 2.42.0
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or
  possibly, any description at all, in the email body.  Please read the
  section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what is needed in
  order to properly describe the change.

- You sent a patch that has been sent multiple times in the past, and is
  identical to ones that has been rejected.  Please always look at the
  mailing list traffic to determine if you are duplicating other
  people's work.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ