[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mk34n3vslyf6srydefxubwfst6bgymu27fabtdhopv3fi2hc7y@vpm6naewdorw>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:35:47 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
To: Dipam Turkar <dipamt1729@...il.com>
Cc: maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, tzimmermann@...e.de,
airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch, mairacanal@...eup.net, javierm@...hat.com,
christian.koenig@....com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] drm/tests: Add KUnit tests for
drm_mode_create_dvi_i_properties()
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 04:23:38PM +0530, Dipam Turkar wrote:
> Introduce unit tests for the drm_mode_create_dvi_i_properties() function to ensure
> the proper creation of DVI-I specific connector properties and success if called
> multiple times.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dipam Turkar <dipamt1729@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_connector_test.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_connector_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_connector_test.c
> index c66aa2dc8d9d..217c0988171e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_connector_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_connector_test.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,9 @@
> */
>
> #include <drm/drm_connector.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_device.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_drv.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h>
>
> #include <kunit/test.h>
>
> @@ -70,7 +73,62 @@ static struct kunit_suite drm_get_tv_mode_from_name_test_suite = {
> .test_cases = drm_get_tv_mode_from_name_tests,
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Test that drm_mode_create_dvi_i_properties() succeeds and
> + * DVI-I subconnector and select subconectors properties have
> + * been created.
> + */
> +static void drm_test_mode_create_dvi_i_properties(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *drm;
> + struct device *dev;
> +
> + dev = drm_kunit_helper_alloc_device(test);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, dev);
> +
> + drm = __drm_kunit_helper_alloc_drm_device(test, dev, sizeof(*drm), 0, DRIVER_MODESET);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, drm);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_mode_create_dvi_i_properties(drm), 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, drm->mode_config.dvi_i_select_subconnector_property);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, drm->mode_config.dvi_i_subconnector_property);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Test that drm_mode_create_dvi_i_properties() doesn't fail if called twice.
> + */
> +static void drm_test_mode_create_dvi_i_properties_repeated(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *drm;
> + struct device *dev;
> +
> + dev = drm_kunit_helper_alloc_device(test);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, dev);
> +
> + drm = __drm_kunit_helper_alloc_drm_device(test, dev, sizeof(*drm), 0, DRIVER_MODESET);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, drm);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_mode_create_dvi_i_properties(drm), 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, drm->mode_config.dvi_i_select_subconnector_property);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, drm->mode_config.dvi_i_subconnector_property);
> +
> + /* Expect the function to return 0 if called twice. */
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_mode_create_dvi_i_properties(drm), 0);
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case drm_mode_create_dvi_i_properties_tests[] = {
> + KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_mode_create_dvi_i_properties),
> + KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_mode_create_dvi_i_properties_repeated),
> + { }
> +};
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite drm_mode_create_dvi_i_properties_test_suite = {
> + .name = "drm_mode_create_dvi_i_properties",
> + .test_cases = drm_mode_create_dvi_i_properties_tests,
> +};
> +
> kunit_test_suite(drm_get_tv_mode_from_name_test_suite);
> +kunit_test_suite(drm_mode_create_dvi_i_properties_test_suite);
You should use kunit_test_suites here
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists