[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MduNZ63ATVFG9HyrO1GggroeCy7BFtozRmz5dEz0e4-RA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:04:15 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Hector Palacios <hector.palacios@...i.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, andy@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
festevam@...il.com, linux-imx@....com, stefan@...er.ch,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] gpio: support i.MX93 truly available GPIO pins
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:45 AM Hector Palacios
<hector.palacios@...i.com> wrote:
>
> All four GPIO ports of i.MX93 SoC show 32 pins available, but
> not every port has 32 pins.
> Add support on the GPIO driver to 'ngpios' property and set
> the truly available pins on the SoC device tree.
>
> v4
> * Remove 'description' from 'npgio' field in bindings as it
> is a generic one.
>
> v3
> * Move DT bindings to a patch of its own
> * Improve reasoning for adding support in driver
>
> v2
> * Add 'ngpios' property to DT binding for proper validation
>
> Hector Palacios (3):
> gpio: vf610: add support to DT 'ngpios' property
> dt-bindings: gpio: vf610: add optional 'ngpios'
> arm64: dts: imx93: specify available 'ngpios' per GPIO port
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-vf610.yaml | 5 +++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi | 4 ++++
> drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c | 7 ++++++-
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>
Please don't spam the list with new versions less than an hour apart.
Leave the maintainers at least a couple days to respond. Especially
during the merge window.
Bartosz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists