linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] firmware: arm_scmi: Register and handle limits change notification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <674d8057-94b1-2e8a-a3ce-d8719e978298@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 17:36:52 +0530
From: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
CC: <sudeep.holla@....com>, <rafael@...nel.org>, <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <quic_mdtipton@...cinc.com>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] firmware: arm_scmi: Register and handle limits change
 notification



On 1/17/24 15:11, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 07:31:15PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>> This series registers for scmi limits change notifications and adds
>> perf_notify_support/perf_opp_xlate interfaces which are used by the
>> scmi cpufreq driver to determine the throttled frequency and apply HW
>> pressure.
>>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> a few initial remarks from the mere SCMI standpoint.
> 
> Unlinke most SCMI protocols that expose domains info bits via an
> *info_get protocol operation, PERF does no do this since (till now) there
> wasn't a compelling reason (i.e. users)
> 
> Ulf recently in his GenPD/SCMI series recently started exposing something
> and now you need to expose even more, adding also a new xlate ops.
> 
> For the sake of simplicity, I think that we could now expose straight
> away the whole perf_domain_info and embedded structs via the usual *info_get.
> 
> After having done that, you can just drop your patch 1 and 2 since you
> can access the needed info from the cpufreq_driver right away.
> 
> Having said, I have already such patch ready (for my internal testing), I
> wll post it by the end of week after a minor cleanup, if you can bear with me.
> 
> Thoughts ?

Ack, just from the naming I initially thought info_get would include
everything but it just exposed minimal info. We certainly don't want to
keep adding very similar ops just to expose more such info. I'll re-send
the remainder of the series after you are done with your patches.
Thanks.

-Sibi

> 
> Thanks,
> Cristian